International social work research: transfer of knowledge or promotion of dialogue beyond borders?

IF 1.1
T. Bertotti, S. Fargion
{"title":"International social work research: transfer of knowledge or promotion of dialogue beyond borders?","authors":"T. Bertotti, S. Fargion","doi":"10.1332/jzlt8735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social work has developed unevenly within Europe and globally, with differences in terms of its recognition, training, professionalisation and academisation. This is mirrored in an unbalance in reciprocal influence, particularly vis-a-vis knowledge production, and the origin of tensions between importing/exporting ‘ready-made’ ideas from stronger social work communities and efforts towards indigenisation and locally rooted knowledge production. Structurally embedded in these tensions, we consider the role of international associations and attendant events in promoting internationalisation processes that reflect cultural dominance or, conversely, balance tensions between universalism and localism. To develop a reflection on these issues, we analysed materials used for launching the European Conference for Social Work Research conferences. Two meaningful aspects emerged: efforts at maintaining an all-embracing profile without privileging specific approaches; and the identification of shared open themes to enable mutual understanding of differences. Social work professional identity, the socio-political dimensions of social work and comparing research methodologies constituted starting points for international conversations. Arguably, nurturing such dialogues can have a significant, if indirect, function in the development of an international language and shared conceptualisations, or, at least, an awareness of different conceptualisations vis-a-vis practices of knowledge co-construction.","PeriodicalId":220779,"journal":{"name":"European Social Work Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Social Work Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/jzlt8735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social work has developed unevenly within Europe and globally, with differences in terms of its recognition, training, professionalisation and academisation. This is mirrored in an unbalance in reciprocal influence, particularly vis-a-vis knowledge production, and the origin of tensions between importing/exporting ‘ready-made’ ideas from stronger social work communities and efforts towards indigenisation and locally rooted knowledge production. Structurally embedded in these tensions, we consider the role of international associations and attendant events in promoting internationalisation processes that reflect cultural dominance or, conversely, balance tensions between universalism and localism. To develop a reflection on these issues, we analysed materials used for launching the European Conference for Social Work Research conferences. Two meaningful aspects emerged: efforts at maintaining an all-embracing profile without privileging specific approaches; and the identification of shared open themes to enable mutual understanding of differences. Social work professional identity, the socio-political dimensions of social work and comparing research methodologies constituted starting points for international conversations. Arguably, nurturing such dialogues can have a significant, if indirect, function in the development of an international language and shared conceptualisations, or, at least, an awareness of different conceptualisations vis-a-vis practices of knowledge co-construction.
国际社会工作研究:知识的转移还是跨国界对话的促进?
社会工作在欧洲和全球范围内发展不平衡,在其认可,培训,专业化和学术化方面存在差异。这反映在相互影响方面的不平衡,特别是在知识生产方面,以及从更强大的社会工作社区进口/出口“现成”思想与努力实现本土化和扎根于当地的知识生产之间的紧张关系的根源。在这些紧张关系的结构中,我们考虑了国际协会和随之而来的事件在促进反映文化主导地位的国际化进程中的作用,或者相反,平衡普遍主义和地方主义之间的紧张关系。为了对这些问题进行反思,我们分析了启动欧洲社会工作研究会议的材料。出现了两个有意义的方面:努力保持包罗万象的形象,而不给予具体方法特权;并确定共同的开放主题,以便相互理解差异。社会工作的专业认同、社会工作的社会政治维度和比较研究方法构成了国际对话的起点。可以说,培养这样的对话可以在国际语言和共享概念的发展中发挥重要的作用,如果间接的话,或者,至少,对不同概念的认识相对于知识共同构建的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书