MACULAR OCT FINDINGS AFTER SUCCESSFUL RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR; A COMPARISON BETWEEN CASES WITH AND WITHOUT VISUAL IMPROVEMENT

E. M., Farouk, M., M. E.
{"title":"MACULAR OCT FINDINGS AFTER SUCCESSFUL RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR; A COMPARISON BETWEEN CASES WITH AND WITHOUT VISUAL IMPROVEMENT","authors":"E. M., Farouk, M., M. E.","doi":"10.21608/ejco.2018.163038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: A comparative study using OCT to determine the possible causes associated with incomplete visual recovery after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair in cases with and without visual improvement. Patients& methods: We studied 200 eyes of 200 patients with RRD that involved the fovea. The patients were examined and the findings recorded before and after surgery. The period from the onset of symptoms to presentation ranged from 3-60 days. OCT was performed at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th post-operative months. The patients were followed for a period from 6-18 months (mean 8.4 months). Results: On comparing the best corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) at 1st and 6th months, there was a mean gain of 3 Snellen lines (range; 1-6 lines) in 160 patients (80%) and no improvement in 40 patients (20%).The mean postoperative BCVA at 1,3 and 6 months of the improved patients was 6/60, 6/24,and 6/18 respectively (Log MAR equivalent of 1.00, 0.60 ,and 0.50 ). OCT of these 40 eyes without visual improvement showed subfoveal fluid in 10 eyes (25%), macular edema(ME) in 21 (52.5%) eyes, epiretinal membranes(ERM) in 15 eyes (37.5%), photoreceptor damage (distortion of the photoreceptors IS/OS junction in 31 eyes (77.5%), macular holes(MH) in 2 eyes (5%), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) degenerative changes in 11 eyes (27.5%). OCT of those with visual improvement also showed some abnormalities which contributed to incomplete visual recovery: ME in 21 eyes (13.2%), ERM in 9 (5.6%)eyes, subfoveal fluid in 40 eyes (25%), photoreceptor damage in 31 eyes (19.4%), and RPE degenerative changes in 12 eyes (7.5%). Conclusion: Incomplete and/or delayed visual recovery after successful retinal reattachment may occur even in cases with visual improvement due to many causes; photoreceptor damage, macular edema, epiretinal membranes, subfoveal fluid, macular holes, and RPE degenerative changes. OCT is a valuable and noninvasive tool for detecting, evaluating and follow-up of these cases.","PeriodicalId":267572,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejco.2018.163038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A comparative study using OCT to determine the possible causes associated with incomplete visual recovery after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair in cases with and without visual improvement. Patients& methods: We studied 200 eyes of 200 patients with RRD that involved the fovea. The patients were examined and the findings recorded before and after surgery. The period from the onset of symptoms to presentation ranged from 3-60 days. OCT was performed at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th post-operative months. The patients were followed for a period from 6-18 months (mean 8.4 months). Results: On comparing the best corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) at 1st and 6th months, there was a mean gain of 3 Snellen lines (range; 1-6 lines) in 160 patients (80%) and no improvement in 40 patients (20%).The mean postoperative BCVA at 1,3 and 6 months of the improved patients was 6/60, 6/24,and 6/18 respectively (Log MAR equivalent of 1.00, 0.60 ,and 0.50 ). OCT of these 40 eyes without visual improvement showed subfoveal fluid in 10 eyes (25%), macular edema(ME) in 21 (52.5%) eyes, epiretinal membranes(ERM) in 15 eyes (37.5%), photoreceptor damage (distortion of the photoreceptors IS/OS junction in 31 eyes (77.5%), macular holes(MH) in 2 eyes (5%), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) degenerative changes in 11 eyes (27.5%). OCT of those with visual improvement also showed some abnormalities which contributed to incomplete visual recovery: ME in 21 eyes (13.2%), ERM in 9 (5.6%)eyes, subfoveal fluid in 40 eyes (25%), photoreceptor damage in 31 eyes (19.4%), and RPE degenerative changes in 12 eyes (7.5%). Conclusion: Incomplete and/or delayed visual recovery after successful retinal reattachment may occur even in cases with visual improvement due to many causes; photoreceptor damage, macular edema, epiretinal membranes, subfoveal fluid, macular holes, and RPE degenerative changes. OCT is a valuable and noninvasive tool for detecting, evaluating and follow-up of these cases.
孔源性视网膜脱离修复成功后黄斑oct表现有视力改善和无视力改善病例的比较
目的:利用OCT进行对比研究,以确定有和无视力改善的孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)修复成功后视力恢复不完全的可能原因。患者和方法:我们研究了200例涉及中央窝的RRD患者的200只眼睛。在手术前后对患者进行检查并记录结果。从出现症状到出现症状的时间为3-60天。术后1、3、6个月行OCT检查。随访6 ~ 18个月,平均8.4个月。结果:比较第1个月和第6个月的最佳矫正视力(BCVAs),平均增加3条Snellen线(范围;160例患者(80%)1-6行),40例患者(20%)无改善。改善患者术后1、3和6个月的平均BCVA分别为6/60、6/24和6/18 (Log MAR等效为1.00、0.60和0.50)。40眼视力无改善的OCT示中央凹下积液10眼(25%),黄斑水肿21眼(52.5%),视网膜前膜(ERM) 15眼(37.5%),光感受器损伤(光感受器IS/OS连接畸变31眼(77.5%),黄斑孔洞2眼(5%),视网膜色素上皮(RPE)退行性改变11眼(27.5%)。视力改善者的OCT也显示一些异常导致视力不完全恢复:ME 21眼(13.2%),ERM 9眼(5.6%),中央凹下积液40眼(25%),光感受器损伤31眼(19.4%),RPE退行性改变12眼(7.5%)。结论:由于多种原因,即使视力改善,视网膜再植成功后也可能出现视力恢复不完全和/或延迟的情况;光感受器损伤、黄斑水肿、视网膜前膜、中央凹下液、黄斑孔洞和RPE退行性改变。OCT是检测、评估和随访这些病例的一种有价值的无创工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信