Differences in cortico-cortical functional connections between children with good and poor handwriting: A case study

S. Hashim, N. Safri, P. I. Khalid, M. A. Othman, J. Yunus
{"title":"Differences in cortico-cortical functional connections between children with good and poor handwriting: A case study","authors":"S. Hashim, N. Safri, P. I. Khalid, M. A. Othman, J. Yunus","doi":"10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2014.6862993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to investigate the directional connectivity in brain between children who has good handwriting and poor handwriting. Two children participated in the case study. Test subject was the one that showed symptoms of handwriting difficulty and was identified by her teacher as below average writer. Control subject on the other hand was the one that did not show any symptom of handwriting difficulty and was confirmed by her teacher as average writer. Subjects must trace on the digitizing tablet three different unlined shapes. While doing the drawing task, brain signal were recorded using electroencephalogram (EEG) machine to analyze the information pathway using partial directed coherence (PDC) method in Linux open source. Results showed that subject with poor handwriting mostly drew with non-preferred movement and the brain region that became the source of functional coupling was the frontal region where planning and organizing for execution are performed. Mean-while, subject with good handwriting had performed the tracing with preferred movement and PDC showed that the information source came from occipital area, an indication of visual input and sinked to various brain regions, including temporal area for recognizing shape and frontal area for planning and organizing movement. As conclusion, brain analysis of poor handwriting child shows that the movement planning was poorly executed since frontal area does not have any input from any other sources compared to the brain of good handwriting child which had some input from other sources that makes movement well-planned.","PeriodicalId":270495,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE REGION 10 SYMPOSIUM","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE REGION 10 SYMPOSIUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCONSPRING.2014.6862993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate the directional connectivity in brain between children who has good handwriting and poor handwriting. Two children participated in the case study. Test subject was the one that showed symptoms of handwriting difficulty and was identified by her teacher as below average writer. Control subject on the other hand was the one that did not show any symptom of handwriting difficulty and was confirmed by her teacher as average writer. Subjects must trace on the digitizing tablet three different unlined shapes. While doing the drawing task, brain signal were recorded using electroencephalogram (EEG) machine to analyze the information pathway using partial directed coherence (PDC) method in Linux open source. Results showed that subject with poor handwriting mostly drew with non-preferred movement and the brain region that became the source of functional coupling was the frontal region where planning and organizing for execution are performed. Mean-while, subject with good handwriting had performed the tracing with preferred movement and PDC showed that the information source came from occipital area, an indication of visual input and sinked to various brain regions, including temporal area for recognizing shape and frontal area for planning and organizing movement. As conclusion, brain analysis of poor handwriting child shows that the movement planning was poorly executed since frontal area does not have any input from any other sources compared to the brain of good handwriting child which had some input from other sources that makes movement well-planned.
书写好与书写差儿童皮质-皮质功能连接的差异:个案研究
本研究的目的是探讨书写能力好的儿童和书写能力差的儿童在大脑中的定向连接。两个孩子参与了案例研究。测试对象是一个表现出书写困难症状的人,她的老师认为她的书写水平低于平均水平。另一方面,控制对象是没有表现出任何书写困难的症状,并被老师确认为一般写字的人。受试者必须在数字化平板上画出三个不同的无线形状。在完成绘图任务的同时,用脑电图仪记录脑信号,在Linux开源环境下使用部分定向相干性(PDC)方法分析信息通路。结果表明,书写能力差的被试以非偏好运动为主,成为功能耦合来源的脑区是执行计划和组织执行的额叶区。同时,笔迹良好的被试进行了偏好运动的追踪,PDC显示信息源来自视觉输入指示的枕区,并下沉到大脑的各个区域,包括识别形状的颞区和规划和组织运动的额区。综上所述,书写能力差的孩子的大脑分析表明,他们的动作计划执行得很差,因为额叶区域没有任何来自其他来源的输入,而书写能力好的孩子的大脑有一些来自其他来源的输入,这使得他们的动作计划很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信