Benchmarking Graph Database Backends - What Works Well with Wikidata?

T. Kovács, Gábor Simon, G. Mezei
{"title":"Benchmarking Graph Database Backends - What Works Well with Wikidata?","authors":"T. Kovács, Gábor Simon, G. Mezei","doi":"10.14232/ACTACYB.24.1.2019.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge bases often utilize graphs as logical model. RDF-based knowledge bases (KB) are prime examples, as RDF (Resource Description Framework) does use graph as logical model. Graph databases are an emerging breed of NoSQL-type databases, offering graph as the logical model. Although there are specialized databases, the so-called triple stores, for storing RDF data, graph databases can also be promising candidates for storing knowledge. In this paper, we benchmark different graph database implementations loaded with Wikidata, a real-life, large-scale knowledge base. Graph databases come in all shapes and sizes, offer different APIs and graph models. Hence we used a measurement system, that can abstract away the API differences. For the modeling aspect, we made measurements with different graph encodings previously suggested in the literature, in order to observe the impact of the encoding aspect on the overall performance. \n ","PeriodicalId":187125,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cybern.","volume":"GE-25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cybern.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/ACTACYB.24.1.2019.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Knowledge bases often utilize graphs as logical model. RDF-based knowledge bases (KB) are prime examples, as RDF (Resource Description Framework) does use graph as logical model. Graph databases are an emerging breed of NoSQL-type databases, offering graph as the logical model. Although there are specialized databases, the so-called triple stores, for storing RDF data, graph databases can also be promising candidates for storing knowledge. In this paper, we benchmark different graph database implementations loaded with Wikidata, a real-life, large-scale knowledge base. Graph databases come in all shapes and sizes, offer different APIs and graph models. Hence we used a measurement system, that can abstract away the API differences. For the modeling aspect, we made measurements with different graph encodings previously suggested in the literature, in order to observe the impact of the encoding aspect on the overall performance.  
对图数据库后端进行基准测试-什么能很好地与维基数据一起工作?
知识库通常使用图作为逻辑模型。基于RDF的知识库(KB)就是最好的例子,因为RDF(资源描述框架)确实使用图作为逻辑模型。图数据库是nosql类型数据库的一个新兴品种,它提供图作为逻辑模型。虽然有专门的数据库,即所谓的三重存储,用于存储RDF数据,但图数据库也可能是存储知识的有希望的候选者。在本文中,我们对加载了Wikidata(一个真实的大规模知识库)的不同图数据库实现进行了基准测试。图数据库有各种形状和大小,提供不同的api和图模型。因此,我们使用了一个测量系统,它可以抽象出API的差异。在建模方面,我们使用文献中提出的不同的图编码进行测量,以观察编码方面对整体性能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信