Three Evaluation Criteria's towards a Comparison of Two Characters Segmentation Methods for Handwritten Arabic Script

F. B. Samoud, S. Maddouri, H. Amiri
{"title":"Three Evaluation Criteria's towards a Comparison of Two Characters Segmentation Methods for Handwritten Arabic Script","authors":"F. B. Samoud, S. Maddouri, H. Amiri","doi":"10.1109/ICFHR.2012.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents three evaluation criteria's for a comparison of two characters segmentation methods for handwritten Arabic words. The first segmentation method is based on a combination between the projection and the minima and maxima of the contour of the image. The second method is a combination between Hough Transform (HT) and Mathematical Morphology (MM) operators. These methods are developed, evaluated and compared with reference to IFN/ENIT-database in comparison of three evaluation criteria's. The first criterion is based on the segments positions (SP). The second criterion is based on the segments numbers (SN). The third is based on the recognition rates by Transparent Neural Network (RR).","PeriodicalId":291062,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2012.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper presents three evaluation criteria's for a comparison of two characters segmentation methods for handwritten Arabic words. The first segmentation method is based on a combination between the projection and the minima and maxima of the contour of the image. The second method is a combination between Hough Transform (HT) and Mathematical Morphology (MM) operators. These methods are developed, evaluated and compared with reference to IFN/ENIT-database in comparison of three evaluation criteria's. The first criterion is based on the segments positions (SP). The second criterion is based on the segments numbers (SN). The third is based on the recognition rates by Transparent Neural Network (RR).
三种评价标准对两种手写阿拉伯文字字符分割方法的比较
本文提出了三个评价标准,用于比较两种手写阿拉伯文字符切分方法的优劣。第一种分割方法是基于投影与图像轮廓的最小值和最大值之间的组合。第二种方法是霍夫变换(HT)和数学形态学(MM)算子的结合。并参照IFN/ enit数据库对这些方法进行了开发、评价和比较,并对三个评价标准进行了比较。第一个标准是基于片段位置(SP)。第二个标准是基于段数(SN)。第三种是基于透明神经网络(Transparent Neural Network, RR)的识别率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信