A Mixed Method Study to Assess the Effect of Training of Adolescents on Perception and Practices regarding Unintentional Childhood Injuries

B. Banerjee
{"title":"A Mixed Method Study to Assess the Effect of Training of Adolescents on Perception and Practices regarding Unintentional Childhood Injuries","authors":"B. Banerjee","doi":"10.53553/jch.v09i01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Adolescents are the future citizens of any society, who can be trained to become responsible members and also function as change agents in the community to improve children’s health. Child-To-Child Approach is an innovative technique which was used in the present study to improve perception and practices regarding unintentional childhood injuries, by training the adolescent population. Methodology: An intervention study was conducted in two villages of Delhi from April 2017 to July 2019, to test the Child-To-Child Approach in preventing childhood injuries, by training the eldest adolescent in each family of intervention area and encouraging them to disseminate the knowledge to other family members. Present study is a part of the main study and analyses improvement in Perception and Practice (PP) regarding injuries after intervention, as assessed from PP scores of adolescents eligible for training, other adolescents and adult women. Focus group discussions (FGD) for assessing perception were also conducted with adolescents and adult women, at the beginning and end of study. Results: During pre-intervention period, PP scores of all three groups of subjects showed no significant difference between the two areas. Statistically significant improvement was observed in PP scores of all three groups of subjects in the intervention area during the post-intervention phase, in comparison to pre-intervention phase as well as in comparison to scores of control area in post-intervention phase. Findings from the FGD showed that perception of both groups regarding types and reasons of injuries was low in the beginning, but increased markedly in the second FGD in both the groups, compared to the first FGD. Conclusion: These findings indicate that training adolescents and encouraging them to disseminate messages to their siblings and to the adult women of their families, which is the essence of Child-To-Child Approach, is effective in improving the perception and practices regarding unintentional childhood injuries.","PeriodicalId":439371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comprehensive Health","volume":"GE-20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comprehensive Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53553/jch.v09i01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescents are the future citizens of any society, who can be trained to become responsible members and also function as change agents in the community to improve children’s health. Child-To-Child Approach is an innovative technique which was used in the present study to improve perception and practices regarding unintentional childhood injuries, by training the adolescent population. Methodology: An intervention study was conducted in two villages of Delhi from April 2017 to July 2019, to test the Child-To-Child Approach in preventing childhood injuries, by training the eldest adolescent in each family of intervention area and encouraging them to disseminate the knowledge to other family members. Present study is a part of the main study and analyses improvement in Perception and Practice (PP) regarding injuries after intervention, as assessed from PP scores of adolescents eligible for training, other adolescents and adult women. Focus group discussions (FGD) for assessing perception were also conducted with adolescents and adult women, at the beginning and end of study. Results: During pre-intervention period, PP scores of all three groups of subjects showed no significant difference between the two areas. Statistically significant improvement was observed in PP scores of all three groups of subjects in the intervention area during the post-intervention phase, in comparison to pre-intervention phase as well as in comparison to scores of control area in post-intervention phase. Findings from the FGD showed that perception of both groups regarding types and reasons of injuries was low in the beginning, but increased markedly in the second FGD in both the groups, compared to the first FGD. Conclusion: These findings indicate that training adolescents and encouraging them to disseminate messages to their siblings and to the adult women of their families, which is the essence of Child-To-Child Approach, is effective in improving the perception and practices regarding unintentional childhood injuries.
一项评估青少年训练对儿童意外伤害认知和行为影响的混合方法研究
背景:青少年是任何社会的未来公民,他们可以接受培训,成为负责任的成员,并在社区中发挥变革推动者的作用,以改善儿童的健康。儿童对儿童的方法是一种创新的技术,在本研究中使用,以提高认识和实践有关无意的儿童伤害,通过培训青少年人口。方法:2017年4月至2019年7月,在德里的两个村庄进行了一项干预研究,通过培训干预地区每个家庭中最年长的青少年并鼓励他们向其他家庭成员传播知识,来测试儿童对儿童方法在预防儿童伤害方面的作用。本研究是主要研究的一部分,分析了干预后对损伤的感知和实践(PP)的改善,从符合训练条件的青少年,其他青少年和成年妇女的PP评分中评估。在研究开始和结束时,还对青少年和成年妇女进行了评估感知的焦点小组讨论(FGD)。结果:在干预前,三组受试者的PP得分在两个区域之间无显著差异。三组被试在干预后、干预前、干预后的PP得分均较对照组有显著改善。FGD的研究结果表明,两组对受伤类型和原因的认识在开始时都很低,但在第二次FGD中,两组对受伤类型和原因的认识都比第一次FGD明显增加。结论:这些研究结果表明,儿童对儿童方法的本质是对青少年进行培训并鼓励他们向兄弟姐妹和家庭中的成年妇女传播信息,这对改善儿童意外伤害的认识和实践是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信