LOCAL POLITICAL CONTESTATION WITH NATIONAL ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DEMOCRARCY AND GOOD GOVERNANCE INI ASEAN COUNTRIES

Tamrin Kiram, Afrizal, Helmi, Asrinaldi, I. Putri
{"title":"LOCAL POLITICAL CONTESTATION WITH NATIONAL ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DEMOCRARCY AND GOOD GOVERNANCE INI ASEAN COUNTRIES","authors":"Tamrin Kiram, Afrizal, Helmi, Asrinaldi, I. Putri","doi":"10.1515/9783110678666-025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there are similarities in the form of democratic institution found in Southeast Asia countries, but the application the form of democracy are different according to different environmental factors, such as social, economic and cultural factors. Some of the influence of these enivironmental factors differe between the notion of democracy as the universal idea found in daily practices with the theory of democracy as a result of long history from the ancient Greek to the modern democratic principle. Therefore, there is a missing link between democratic theory contained in state constitution with the the democrartic practises in local community, The form of representative democracy contained in the Constitution of the State as a form of theory differs from the practice of deliberative democracy on the form of choosing leaders and the decision making process used in local communities. The following article explains the the concept of power in Southeast Asia society that have concrete characteristics, originating form one sources, limited in number, and do not question the aspect of marality of power as a distinct feature from the concept of modern power that is abstract, originating from many sources, unlkimited in number, and dispute in morality of the power. Through the use of the qualitative methods and phenomenological approach, it was found the missing link between the theory of democaracy practiced with the universal ideas of democracy practises in Southeast Asian countries stemmed from differences in the concept of power that differ form traditional concept of power with the modern understanding concept of power","PeriodicalId":424710,"journal":{"name":"The International Conference on ASEAN 2019","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Conference on ASEAN 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110678666-025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there are similarities in the form of democratic institution found in Southeast Asia countries, but the application the form of democracy are different according to different environmental factors, such as social, economic and cultural factors. Some of the influence of these enivironmental factors differe between the notion of democracy as the universal idea found in daily practices with the theory of democracy as a result of long history from the ancient Greek to the modern democratic principle. Therefore, there is a missing link between democratic theory contained in state constitution with the the democrartic practises in local community, The form of representative democracy contained in the Constitution of the State as a form of theory differs from the practice of deliberative democracy on the form of choosing leaders and the decision making process used in local communities. The following article explains the the concept of power in Southeast Asia society that have concrete characteristics, originating form one sources, limited in number, and do not question the aspect of marality of power as a distinct feature from the concept of modern power that is abstract, originating from many sources, unlkimited in number, and dispute in morality of the power. Through the use of the qualitative methods and phenomenological approach, it was found the missing link between the theory of democaracy practiced with the universal ideas of democracy practises in Southeast Asian countries stemmed from differences in the concept of power that differ form traditional concept of power with the modern understanding concept of power
地方政治与国家在东盟国家实施民主和善政的争论
虽然东南亚国家在民主制度的形式上有相似之处,但根据不同的环境因素,如社会、经济和文化因素,对民主形式的运用也有所不同。这些环境因素的一些影响不同于作为日常实践中普遍观念的民主概念与作为从古希腊到现代民主原则的漫长历史结果的民主理论。因此,国家宪法所包含的民主理论与地方社区的民主实践之间存在着缺失的联系。作为一种理论形式,国家宪法所包含的代议制民主形式与协商民主的实践在选择领导人的形式和地方社区所采用的决策过程上存在着差异。下面的文章解释了东南亚社会的权力概念具有具体的特征,起源于一个来源,数量有限,并没有质疑权力的道德性方面作为现代权力概念的一个明显特征,它是抽象的,起源于许多来源,数量不限,以及权力的道德争议。运用定性方法和现象学方法,发现东南亚国家民主实践理论与普遍民主实践理念之间的缺失环节源于权力观念的差异,即传统权力观念与现代理解的权力观念的差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信