{"title":"CVA Wrong Way Risk: Calibration Using Quanto CDS Basis","authors":"T. Chung, J. Gregory","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3188793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we discuss the calibration of wrong way risk (WWR) model by using information from the credit default swap (CDS) market. A Quanto CDS provides credit protection against the default of a reference entity but is denominated in a non-domestic currency. The payoff of a Quanto CDS contract therefore reflects the market-implied interaction of FX risk and a credit event. This in turn, defines the cost of hedging WWR for a FX-sensitive portfolio. Our empirical evidence shows that the implied FX jump sizes are significant for a wide range of corporates. For systemic counterparties, the CVA WWR add-on could be 40% higher than the standard case, and choosing a proper jump-at-default WWR model is critical to capture the impact. In contrast, historical correlation gives the incorrect relationship (right-way risk) and cannot calibrate to the market prices in many cases, leading to the mispricing of CVA WWR.","PeriodicalId":293888,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Derivatives eJournal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Derivatives eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
In this article, we discuss the calibration of wrong way risk (WWR) model by using information from the credit default swap (CDS) market. A Quanto CDS provides credit protection against the default of a reference entity but is denominated in a non-domestic currency. The payoff of a Quanto CDS contract therefore reflects the market-implied interaction of FX risk and a credit event. This in turn, defines the cost of hedging WWR for a FX-sensitive portfolio. Our empirical evidence shows that the implied FX jump sizes are significant for a wide range of corporates. For systemic counterparties, the CVA WWR add-on could be 40% higher than the standard case, and choosing a proper jump-at-default WWR model is critical to capture the impact. In contrast, historical correlation gives the incorrect relationship (right-way risk) and cannot calibrate to the market prices in many cases, leading to the mispricing of CVA WWR.