MODERN PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY IN THE LIGHT OF A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH

Y. Dobrolyubska
{"title":"MODERN PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY IN THE LIGHT OF A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH","authors":"Y. Dobrolyubska","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-145-2/48-77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The philosophy of history is based on the ability to see, understand, and explain the totality of history through abstract thinking in the form of philosophical reflection. Philosophical abstractions differ from the abstractions of other sciences in their versatility, reflectivity, ability to penetrate into the basis of things and phenomena of the world. They are, as M. Heidegger emphasized, “aimed at the whole, where man utters the last clarity and leads the last dispute” 1 . Abstractions – a form of being aware of the philosophy of history – are of different levels of generalization. The higher the level at which the philosopher reaches, the more abstract becomes the historical reality. Abstractions of the philosophy of history have many different forms of expression, often from the point of view of historical science are completely inadequate to the essence of the historical process and methodology of its knowledge. From the point of view of the philosophy of history, the Idea of History can be found in a wide variety of segments of objective (or subjective) reality, as well as in the field of mythological and esoteric knowledge. E. Eisenstadt proposes his own concept of axial time, which establishes a special kind of connection between the transcendental and terrestrial worlds, which requires the restructuring of the earthly order of things in accordance with the notions of the transcendental 2 . While respecting the","PeriodicalId":157499,"journal":{"name":"COMPREHENSION OF THE FORMATION OF THE WORLD IN DIFFERENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPREHENSION OF THE FORMATION OF THE WORLD IN DIFFERENT PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-145-2/48-77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The philosophy of history is based on the ability to see, understand, and explain the totality of history through abstract thinking in the form of philosophical reflection. Philosophical abstractions differ from the abstractions of other sciences in their versatility, reflectivity, ability to penetrate into the basis of things and phenomena of the world. They are, as M. Heidegger emphasized, “aimed at the whole, where man utters the last clarity and leads the last dispute” 1 . Abstractions – a form of being aware of the philosophy of history – are of different levels of generalization. The higher the level at which the philosopher reaches, the more abstract becomes the historical reality. Abstractions of the philosophy of history have many different forms of expression, often from the point of view of historical science are completely inadequate to the essence of the historical process and methodology of its knowledge. From the point of view of the philosophy of history, the Idea of History can be found in a wide variety of segments of objective (or subjective) reality, as well as in the field of mythological and esoteric knowledge. E. Eisenstadt proposes his own concept of axial time, which establishes a special kind of connection between the transcendental and terrestrial worlds, which requires the restructuring of the earthly order of things in accordance with the notions of the transcendental 2 . While respecting the
现代哲学史的一种系统方法
历史哲学是建立在以哲学反思的形式通过抽象思维来观察、理解和解释历史整体的能力之上的。哲学的抽象不同于其他科学的抽象,因为它的多功能性、反射性、穿透事物和世界现象基础的能力。正如海德格尔所强调的那样,它们“针对的是整体,在那里人们说出最后的清晰,并引导最后的争论”。抽象是认识历史哲学的一种形式,具有不同层次的概括。哲学家达到的层次越高,历史的现实就越抽象。历史哲学的抽象有许多不同的表现形式,从历史科学的观点来看,往往完全不符合历史过程的本质和认识历史的方法论。从历史哲学的观点来看,历史理念可以在各种各样的客观(或主观)现实中找到,也可以在神话和深奥知识的领域中找到。E. Eisenstadt提出了他自己的轴向时间概念,这一概念在先验世界和尘世世界之间建立了一种特殊的联系,这就要求按照先验2的概念重构尘世的事物秩序。同时尊重
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信