Devolution, Localism and Good Governance in England

D. Smith, E. Wistrich
{"title":"Devolution, Localism and Good Governance in England","authors":"D. Smith, E. Wistrich","doi":"10.4324/9781315576893-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"David Smith and Enid Wistrich, Middlesex University, United Kingdom, London davidsmithhbo@hotmail.com Abstract Globalization continues to raise questions about the future form of the nation state which has led to increasing academic interest in sub-national forms of government and governance (Hooghe, 2012, Rhodes, 1996, Putnam 1993). In Britain there was substantial popular disengagement from conventional national politics before the 2008 economic crisis (Power, 2006). Devolution and \"Localism\" have been themes espoused by all recent British governments though they vary in their interpretation, level of application and consistency of approach. The Labour Government (19972010) first embraced regional devolution to Scotland, Wales, and N. Ireland and attempted unsuccessfully to develop regional governance within England. Later it moved towards a New Localism agenda placing emphasis on sub-regional levels. The present Coalition Government, elected in 2010, also embraces Localism and has replaced the English regional structure with its own sub-regional approach based on Local Economic Partnerships. In this paper we review developments, consider some of the practical implications of \"New Localism\" in England, and make some recommendations, illustrating with our own data drawn from our study (2009, 2012) in which we interviewed members of regional and local elites including local council leaders, politicians, local authority CEOs, local business leaders, and representatives from the 3rd sector.","PeriodicalId":187699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African & Asian Local Government Studies","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African & Asian Local Government Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315576893-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

David Smith and Enid Wistrich, Middlesex University, United Kingdom, London davidsmithhbo@hotmail.com Abstract Globalization continues to raise questions about the future form of the nation state which has led to increasing academic interest in sub-national forms of government and governance (Hooghe, 2012, Rhodes, 1996, Putnam 1993). In Britain there was substantial popular disengagement from conventional national politics before the 2008 economic crisis (Power, 2006). Devolution and "Localism" have been themes espoused by all recent British governments though they vary in their interpretation, level of application and consistency of approach. The Labour Government (19972010) first embraced regional devolution to Scotland, Wales, and N. Ireland and attempted unsuccessfully to develop regional governance within England. Later it moved towards a New Localism agenda placing emphasis on sub-regional levels. The present Coalition Government, elected in 2010, also embraces Localism and has replaced the English regional structure with its own sub-regional approach based on Local Economic Partnerships. In this paper we review developments, consider some of the practical implications of "New Localism" in England, and make some recommendations, illustrating with our own data drawn from our study (2009, 2012) in which we interviewed members of regional and local elites including local council leaders, politicians, local authority CEOs, local business leaders, and representatives from the 3rd sector.
英国的权力下放、地方主义与良好治理
摘要全球化继续提出关于民族国家未来形式的问题,这导致了对次国家形式的政府和治理的学术兴趣增加(Hooghe, 2012, Rhodes, 1996, Putnam 1993)。在2008年经济危机之前,英国有大量民众脱离了传统的国家政治(Power, 2006)。权力下放和“地方主义”一直是最近所有英国政府所支持的主题,尽管它们在解释、应用水平和方法的一致性方面各不相同。工党政府(1997 - 2010)首先将地区权力下放到苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰,并试图在英格兰内部发展地区治理,但没有成功。后来,它转向了强调次区域层面的新地方主义议程。2010年当选的现任联合政府也拥护地方主义,并以基于地方经济伙伴关系的自己的次区域方法取代了英国的区域结构。在本文中,我们回顾了发展,考虑了“新地方主义”在英国的一些实际意义,并提出了一些建议,并从我们的研究(2009年,2012年)中得出了我们自己的数据,其中我们采访了地区和地方精英成员,包括地方议会领导人、政治家、地方当局首席执行官、地方商业领袖和第三部门的代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信