US Efforts to Realise the Right to Health Through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

B. Meier, Lance Gable
{"title":"US Efforts to Realise the Right to Health Through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act","authors":"B. Meier, Lance Gable","doi":"10.1093/HRLR/NGS036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The political acceptance and policy implementation of the right to health long remained uncertain in the United States, leaving it until recently as the only developed nation without policies to realise universal health coverage. By reengaging longstanding debates on government obligations to secure the health of every American, the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act or ACA) draws on an internationally recognised conception of a human right to health, seeking to progressively realise the ‘highest attainable standard of physical and mental health’ through policies that ensure the availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality of health care. With the US Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of most key aspects of the Affordable Care Act, this precedent-setting decision has created an imperative for health care reform in the United States and a model for realising universal health coverage pursuant to the right to health. This article examines the evolution, implementation, and implications of US efforts to realise health-related rights through health care policy. In the evolution of norms for health, Part 2 examines the intertwined history of US development of a right to health in international law and implementation through national health care reforms. Culminating in the promulgation of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, Part 3 analyses how this national policy effort corresponds with the principles of the international right to health – even as it neglects any explicit recognition of the right to health. With the Affordable Care Act immediately challenged as a violation of the US Constitution, Part 4 looks to the first major challenges to the Affordable Care Act, analysing the Supreme Court’s decision on these challenges. As the Supreme Court has now largely upheld the government’s constitutional authority for health care reform, Part 5 considers the continuing challenges to the Affordable Care Act and the precedential impact of this decision on rights-based health reforms throughout the world. This article concludes with a hopeful assessment of the role of the United States as it moves progressively toward universal health coverage and frames an agenda for renewed American participation in global efforts to realise the highest attainable standard of health.","PeriodicalId":423793,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HRLR/NGS036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The political acceptance and policy implementation of the right to health long remained uncertain in the United States, leaving it until recently as the only developed nation without policies to realise universal health coverage. By reengaging longstanding debates on government obligations to secure the health of every American, the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act or ACA) draws on an internationally recognised conception of a human right to health, seeking to progressively realise the ‘highest attainable standard of physical and mental health’ through policies that ensure the availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality of health care. With the US Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of most key aspects of the Affordable Care Act, this precedent-setting decision has created an imperative for health care reform in the United States and a model for realising universal health coverage pursuant to the right to health. This article examines the evolution, implementation, and implications of US efforts to realise health-related rights through health care policy. In the evolution of norms for health, Part 2 examines the intertwined history of US development of a right to health in international law and implementation through national health care reforms. Culminating in the promulgation of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, Part 3 analyses how this national policy effort corresponds with the principles of the international right to health – even as it neglects any explicit recognition of the right to health. With the Affordable Care Act immediately challenged as a violation of the US Constitution, Part 4 looks to the first major challenges to the Affordable Care Act, analysing the Supreme Court’s decision on these challenges. As the Supreme Court has now largely upheld the government’s constitutional authority for health care reform, Part 5 considers the continuing challenges to the Affordable Care Act and the precedential impact of this decision on rights-based health reforms throughout the world. This article concludes with a hopeful assessment of the role of the United States as it moves progressively toward universal health coverage and frames an agenda for renewed American participation in global efforts to realise the highest attainable standard of health.
美国通过《患者保护和平价医疗法案》实现健康权的努力
在美国,健康权的政治接受和政策实施长期以来一直不确定,直到最近,美国才成为唯一没有实现全民健康覆盖政策的发达国家。2010年《患者保护和平价医疗法案》(《平价医疗法案》或ACA)重新参与了长期以来关于政府保障每个美国人健康的义务的辩论,借鉴了国际公认的健康人权概念,寻求通过确保医疗保健的可得性、可及性、可接受性和质量的政策,逐步实现“可达到的最高身心健康标准”。随着美国最高法院维持《可负担医疗法案》的大多数关键方面符合宪法,这一先例性的决定为美国的医疗保健改革创造了必要条件,并为根据健康权实现全民健康覆盖创造了模式。本文考察了美国通过医疗保健政策实现健康相关权利的演变、实施和影响。在健康规范的演变中,第2部分考察了美国在国际法中发展健康权和通过国家医疗改革实施健康权的交织历史。最后颁布了2010年《负担得起的医疗法案》,第三部分分析了这一国家政策努力如何符合国际健康权的原则——尽管它忽略了对健康权的任何明确承认。由于《平价医疗法案》立即受到违反美国宪法的挑战,第四部分将关注《平价医疗法案》面临的第一个主要挑战,并分析最高法院对这些挑战的裁决。由于最高法院现在在很大程度上维护了政府在医疗改革方面的宪法权威,第5部分考虑了《平价医疗法案》面临的持续挑战,以及这一决定对全世界基于权利的医疗改革的先例影响。本文最后对美国在逐步向全民健康覆盖迈进的过程中所扮演的角色进行了充满希望的评估,并为美国重新参与实现可达到的最高健康标准的全球努力制定了议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信