Margit Malmmose, R. Lueg, S. Khusainova, P. Iversen, Seth Boampong Panti
{"title":"Charging Customers or Making Profit? Business Model Change in the Software Industry","authors":"Margit Malmmose, R. Lueg, S. Khusainova, P. Iversen, Seth Boampong Panti","doi":"10.5278/OJS.JBM.V2I1.721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Advancements in technology, changing customer demands or new market entrants are often seen as a necessary condition to trigger the creation of new Business Models, or disruptive change in existing ones. Yet, the sufficient condition is often determined by pricing and how customers are willing to pay for the technology (Chesbrough and Rosenbloom, 2002). As a consequence, much research on Business Models has focused on innovation and technology management (Rajala et al., 2012; Zott et al., 2011), and software-specific frameworks for Business Models have emerged (Popp, 2011; Rajala et al., 2003; Rajala et al., 2004; Stahl, 2004). This paper attempts to illustrate Business Model change in the software industry. Design: Drawing on Rajala et al. (2003), this case study explores the (1) antecedents and (2) consequences of a Business Model-change in a logistics software company. The company decided to abolish their profitable fee-based licensing for an internet-based version of its core product and to offer it as freeware including unlimited service. Findings: Firstly, we illustrate how external developments in technology and customer demands (pricing), as well as the desire for a sustainable Business Model, have led to this drastic change. Secondly, we initially find that much of the company’s new Business Model is congruent with the company-focused framework of Rajala et al. (2003) [product strategy; distribution model, services and implementation; revenue logic]. Value: The existing frameworks for Business Models in the software industry cannot fully explain the disruptive change in the Business Model. Therefore, we suggest extending the framework by the element of ‘innovation’.","PeriodicalId":223617,"journal":{"name":"Strategy Models for Firm Performance Enhancement eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy Models for Firm Performance Enhancement eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5278/OJS.JBM.V2I1.721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
Abstract
Purpose: Advancements in technology, changing customer demands or new market entrants are often seen as a necessary condition to trigger the creation of new Business Models, or disruptive change in existing ones. Yet, the sufficient condition is often determined by pricing and how customers are willing to pay for the technology (Chesbrough and Rosenbloom, 2002). As a consequence, much research on Business Models has focused on innovation and technology management (Rajala et al., 2012; Zott et al., 2011), and software-specific frameworks for Business Models have emerged (Popp, 2011; Rajala et al., 2003; Rajala et al., 2004; Stahl, 2004). This paper attempts to illustrate Business Model change in the software industry. Design: Drawing on Rajala et al. (2003), this case study explores the (1) antecedents and (2) consequences of a Business Model-change in a logistics software company. The company decided to abolish their profitable fee-based licensing for an internet-based version of its core product and to offer it as freeware including unlimited service. Findings: Firstly, we illustrate how external developments in technology and customer demands (pricing), as well as the desire for a sustainable Business Model, have led to this drastic change. Secondly, we initially find that much of the company’s new Business Model is congruent with the company-focused framework of Rajala et al. (2003) [product strategy; distribution model, services and implementation; revenue logic]. Value: The existing frameworks for Business Models in the software industry cannot fully explain the disruptive change in the Business Model. Therefore, we suggest extending the framework by the element of ‘innovation’.
目的:技术的进步,不断变化的客户需求或新的市场进入者通常被视为触发创建新的商业模式或现有商业模式的破坏性变化的必要条件。然而,充分条件往往是由定价和客户愿意如何支付技术决定的(Chesbrough和Rosenbloom, 2002)。因此,许多关于商业模式的研究都集中在创新和技术管理上(Rajala et al., 2012;Zott et al., 2011),商业模型的软件特定框架已经出现(Popp, 2011;Rajala et al., 2003;Rajala et al., 2004;斯特尔,2004)。本文试图说明软件行业的商业模式变化。设计:借鉴Rajala等人(2003),本案例研究探讨了一家物流软件公司商业模式变革的(1)前因和(2)后果。该公司决定取消其核心产品的互联网版本的收费许可,并将其作为免费软件提供,包括无限服务。首先,我们说明了技术和客户需求(定价)的外部发展,以及对可持续商业模式的渴望,是如何导致这种巨大变化的。其次,我们最初发现,公司的新商业模式与Rajala等人(2003)的以公司为中心的框架是一致的[产品战略;分销模式、服务和实施;收入逻辑)。价值:软件行业中现有的业务模型框架不能完全解释业务模型中的破坏性变化。因此,我们建议通过“创新”元素扩展框架。