STAR Interview with Josh Gamson 10/10/2003

Heather E. Burgess
{"title":"STAR Interview with Josh Gamson 10/10/2003","authors":"Heather E. Burgess","doi":"10.17161/STR.1808.5205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"JG: Because they're both different. The colloquium talk is sort of the beginning of a project I've been working on for, I guess, a year and a half now—it's taking me a long time to get the data analyzed—that was sparked by, I think it was sparked by an e mail that I'll quote to you guys in the colloquium, written by an activist, by a guy who used to be publisher of OUT magazine, about the specter of monopoly in gay and lesbian press. And it sounded just like the things people were saying when AOL and Time Warner merged. You know, every time there is a big merg er, there is the specter of monopoly from left-wing media critics. And I can identify with that side of media criticism, but I thought that was just kind of weird for a couple of reasons. First of all, the idea that gay and lesbian culture was developed enough that we could have our own media giant was funny—I'm used to just the little bar newspapers. So whereas, on the one hand this is a weird, hopeful sign—almost a backward hopeful sign—that we","PeriodicalId":338053,"journal":{"name":"Social thought & research","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

JG: Because they're both different. The colloquium talk is sort of the beginning of a project I've been working on for, I guess, a year and a half now—it's taking me a long time to get the data analyzed—that was sparked by, I think it was sparked by an e mail that I'll quote to you guys in the colloquium, written by an activist, by a guy who used to be publisher of OUT magazine, about the specter of monopoly in gay and lesbian press. And it sounded just like the things people were saying when AOL and Time Warner merged. You know, every time there is a big merg er, there is the specter of monopoly from left-wing media critics. And I can identify with that side of media criticism, but I thought that was just kind of weird for a couple of reasons. First of all, the idea that gay and lesbian culture was developed enough that we could have our own media giant was funny—I'm used to just the little bar newspapers. So whereas, on the one hand this is a weird, hopeful sign—almost a backward hopeful sign—that we
2003年10月10日STAR专访Josh Gamson
高:因为它们都是不同的。这个研讨会的演讲是一个项目的开始,我想我已经做了一年半了——我花了很长时间来分析数据——这个项目是由一封电子邮件引发的,我想我会在研讨会上引用这封电子邮件,是由一个活动家写的,由一个曾经是OUT杂志的出版商的人写的,关于同性恋媒体垄断的幽灵。这听起来就像美国在线和时代华纳合并时人们说的话。你知道,每次有一个大的合并,就会有来自左翼媒体评论家的垄断幽灵。我可以认同媒体批评的那一面,但我认为这有点奇怪,有几个原因。首先,认为同性恋文化发展到足以让我们拥有自己的媒体巨头的想法很有趣——我已经习惯了酒吧里的小报纸。所以,一方面,这是一个奇怪的,充满希望的信号——几乎是一个落后的希望信号——我们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信