PERCEPTION OF PHYSIOTHERAPIST ON EFFECTS OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION IN COMPARISON TO THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND FOR THE TREATMENT OF GRADE V BELL’S PALSY

F. Shaheen
{"title":"PERCEPTION OF PHYSIOTHERAPIST ON EFFECTS OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION IN COMPARISON TO THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND FOR THE TREATMENT OF GRADE V BELL’S PALSY","authors":"F. Shaheen","doi":"10.36283/PJR.ZU.10.2/010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIMS\nTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Ultrasound (US) both are the most common therapeutic intervention modalities applied for Bell’s palsy treatment. The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in order to evaluate the perception of physiotherapist regarding the effects of TENS and US in comparison for the treatment of grade V Bell’s palsy.\nMETHODOLOGY\nIt is an observational study based on cross sectional survey based on questionnaire from the physical therapists of a tertiary care hospital with the clinical experience of one year or more. The sample size was 45 based on convenient sampling technique with the mean age of 27.4 ± 7.75 years. \nRESULTS\nThe results of the study indicated that preference of therapist for the effective treatment of grade 5 Bell’s palsy is TENS in comparison to US for early prognosis and patient’s satisfaction. Further, the therapist prefers burst mode of TENS for effective results.\nCONCLUSION\nThough the study favors use of TENS \nHowever, due to small sample size, further studies are required to be conducted in domain to strengthen the role of Burst Mode of TENS as an effective intervention for Bell’s palsy.","PeriodicalId":191321,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36283/PJR.ZU.10.2/010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Ultrasound (US) both are the most common therapeutic intervention modalities applied for Bell’s palsy treatment. The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in order to evaluate the perception of physiotherapist regarding the effects of TENS and US in comparison for the treatment of grade V Bell’s palsy. METHODOLOGY It is an observational study based on cross sectional survey based on questionnaire from the physical therapists of a tertiary care hospital with the clinical experience of one year or more. The sample size was 45 based on convenient sampling technique with the mean age of 27.4 ± 7.75 years. RESULTS The results of the study indicated that preference of therapist for the effective treatment of grade 5 Bell’s palsy is TENS in comparison to US for early prognosis and patient’s satisfaction. Further, the therapist prefers burst mode of TENS for effective results. CONCLUSION Though the study favors use of TENS However, due to small sample size, further studies are required to be conducted in domain to strengthen the role of Burst Mode of TENS as an effective intervention for Bell’s palsy.
物理治疗师对经皮神经电刺激与超声治疗治疗v级贝尔麻痹效果的比较
经皮神经电刺激(TENS)和超声(US)都是应用于贝尔麻痹治疗的最常见的治疗干预方式。本研究在一家三级护理医院进行,目的是评估物理治疗师对TENS和US治疗V级贝尔麻痹的效果的看法。方法采用横断面调查法,对某三级医院具有1年以上临床经验的物理治疗师进行问卷调查。采用方便抽样法,样本量45例,平均年龄27.4±7.75岁。结果在早期预后和患者满意度方面,治疗者对5级贝尔麻痹有效治疗的偏好为TENS,高于US。此外,为了获得有效的结果,治疗师更倾向于burst模式的TENS。结论虽然本研究倾向于使用TENS,但由于样本量较小,需要在该领域进行进一步的研究,以加强TENS的Burst Mode对贝尔麻痹的有效干预作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信