{"title":"Audio-Based Onset Detection applied to Chewing Cycle Segmentation","authors":"D. Kopyto, Rui Zhang, O. Amft","doi":"10.1145/3460421.3478819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we compare three onset detection algorithms for acoustic chewing cycle detection, which is a basic step in eating detection and automated dietary monitoring. We introduce a spectral flux algorithm that uses the spectrogram of a chewing sequence to compute a novelty function. Furthermore, beat tracking, in particular the notion of a predominant local pulse is introduced. We compare the two algorithms to a baseline energy-based segmentation in a chewing dataset with seven participants consuming pieces of six different foods, including in total 9818 annotated chewing cycles. Best performance was achieved for the beat tracking algorithm with 83% F-measure after leave-one-participant-out cross validation.","PeriodicalId":395295,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3460421.3478819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this paper we compare three onset detection algorithms for acoustic chewing cycle detection, which is a basic step in eating detection and automated dietary monitoring. We introduce a spectral flux algorithm that uses the spectrogram of a chewing sequence to compute a novelty function. Furthermore, beat tracking, in particular the notion of a predominant local pulse is introduced. We compare the two algorithms to a baseline energy-based segmentation in a chewing dataset with seven participants consuming pieces of six different foods, including in total 9818 annotated chewing cycles. Best performance was achieved for the beat tracking algorithm with 83% F-measure after leave-one-participant-out cross validation.