Using Sentiment Analysis for Pseudo-Relevance Feedback in Social Book Search

Amal Htait, S. Fournier, P. Bellot, L. Azzopardi, G. Pasi
{"title":"Using Sentiment Analysis for Pseudo-Relevance Feedback in Social Book Search","authors":"Amal Htait, S. Fournier, P. Bellot, L. Azzopardi, G. Pasi","doi":"10.1145/3409256.3409847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Book search is a challenging task due to discrepancies between the content and description of books, on one side, and the ways in which people query for books, on the other. However, online reviewers provide an opinionated description of the book, with alternative features that describe the emotional and experiential aspects of the book. Therefore, locating emotional sentences within reviews, could provide a rich alternative source of evidence to help improve book recommendations. Specifically, sentiment analysis (SA) could be employed to identify salient emotional terms, which could then be used for query expansion? This paper explores the employment ofSA based query expansion, in the book search domain. We introduce a sentiment-oriented method for the selection of sentences from the reviews of top rated book. From these sentences, we extract the terms to be employed in the query formulation. The sentence selection process is based on a semi-supervised SA method, which makes use of adapted word embeddings and lexicon seed-words.Using the CLEF 2016 Social Book Search (SBS) Suggestion TrackCollection, an exploratory comparison between standard pseudo-relevance feedback and the proposed sentiment-based approach is performed. The experiments show that the proposed approach obtains 24%-57% improvement over the baselines, whilst the classic technique actually degrades the performance by 14%-51%.","PeriodicalId":430907,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3409256.3409847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Book search is a challenging task due to discrepancies between the content and description of books, on one side, and the ways in which people query for books, on the other. However, online reviewers provide an opinionated description of the book, with alternative features that describe the emotional and experiential aspects of the book. Therefore, locating emotional sentences within reviews, could provide a rich alternative source of evidence to help improve book recommendations. Specifically, sentiment analysis (SA) could be employed to identify salient emotional terms, which could then be used for query expansion? This paper explores the employment ofSA based query expansion, in the book search domain. We introduce a sentiment-oriented method for the selection of sentences from the reviews of top rated book. From these sentences, we extract the terms to be employed in the query formulation. The sentence selection process is based on a semi-supervised SA method, which makes use of adapted word embeddings and lexicon seed-words.Using the CLEF 2016 Social Book Search (SBS) Suggestion TrackCollection, an exploratory comparison between standard pseudo-relevance feedback and the proposed sentiment-based approach is performed. The experiments show that the proposed approach obtains 24%-57% improvement over the baselines, whilst the classic technique actually degrades the performance by 14%-51%.
社交图书搜索中伪相关反馈的情感分析
图书搜索是一项具有挑战性的任务,一方面是因为图书的内容和描述与人们查询图书的方式之间存在差异。然而,在线评论者对这本书提供了一个固执己见的描述,并提供了描述这本书的情感和经验方面的替代功能。因此,在评论中定位情感句子,可以提供丰富的替代证据来源,以帮助改进图书推荐。具体来说,情感分析(SA)可以用来识别显著的情感术语,然后可以用于查询扩展。本文探讨了基于sa的查询扩展在图书搜索领域的应用。我们介绍了一种情感导向的方法,用于从评价最高的书的评论中选择句子。从这些句子中,我们提取要在查询公式中使用的术语。句子选择过程基于半监督情景分析方法,该方法利用自适应词嵌入和词典种子词。使用CLEF 2016社交图书搜索(SBS)建议TrackCollection,对标准伪相关反馈和基于情感的方法进行了探索性比较。实验表明,该方法在基线上的性能提高了24% ~ 57%,而传统方法的性能实际下降了14% ~ 51%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信