#CoronaVirus and public health: the role of social media in sharing health information

Ammina Kothari, K. Walker, K. Burns
{"title":"#CoronaVirus and public health: the role of social media in sharing health information","authors":"Ammina Kothari, K. Walker, K. Burns","doi":"10.1108/oir-03-2021-0143/v1/decision1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine how factual information and misinformation are being shared on Twitter by identifying types of social media users who initiate the information diffusion process.Design/methodology/approach This study used a mixed methodology approach to analyze tweets with COVID-19-related hashtags. First, a social network analysis was conducted to identify social media users who initiate the information diffusion process, followed by a quantitative content analysis of tweets by users with more than 5K retweets to identify what COVID-19 claims, factual information, misinformation and disinformation was shared on Twitter.Findings Results found very little misinformation and disinformation distributed widely. While health experts and journalists shared factual COVID-19-related information, they were not receiving optimum engagement. Tweets by citizens focusing on personal experience or opinions received more retweets and likes compared to any other sender type. Similarly, celebrities received more replies than any other sender type.Practical implications This study helps medical experts and government agencies understand the type of COVID-19 content and communication being shared on social media for population health purposes.Originality/value This study offers insight into how social media users engage with COVID-19-related information on Twitter and offers a typology of categories of information shared about the pandemic.Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-03-2021-0143/.","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-03-2021-0143/v1/decision1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine how factual information and misinformation are being shared on Twitter by identifying types of social media users who initiate the information diffusion process.Design/methodology/approach This study used a mixed methodology approach to analyze tweets with COVID-19-related hashtags. First, a social network analysis was conducted to identify social media users who initiate the information diffusion process, followed by a quantitative content analysis of tweets by users with more than 5K retweets to identify what COVID-19 claims, factual information, misinformation and disinformation was shared on Twitter.Findings Results found very little misinformation and disinformation distributed widely. While health experts and journalists shared factual COVID-19-related information, they were not receiving optimum engagement. Tweets by citizens focusing on personal experience or opinions received more retweets and likes compared to any other sender type. Similarly, celebrities received more replies than any other sender type.Practical implications This study helps medical experts and government agencies understand the type of COVID-19 content and communication being shared on social media for population health purposes.Originality/value This study offers insight into how social media users engage with COVID-19-related information on Twitter and offers a typology of categories of information shared about the pandemic.Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-03-2021-0143/.
#冠状病毒与公共卫生:社交媒体在分享卫生信息中的作用
本研究的目的是通过识别发起信息扩散过程的社交媒体用户类型,来研究事实信息和错误信息是如何在Twitter上被分享的。设计/方法/方法本研究使用混合方法分析带有covid -19相关标签的推文。首先,进行社交网络分析,以确定发起信息扩散过程的社交媒体用户,然后对转发超过5K的用户的推文进行定量内容分析,以确定推特上分享了哪些COVID-19声称,事实信息,错误信息和虚假信息。结果发现错误信息极少,虚假信息传播广泛。虽然卫生专家和记者分享了与covid -19相关的事实信息,但他们没有得到最佳的参与。与其他类型的发送者相比,关注个人经历或观点的公民推文获得了更多的转发和喜欢。同样,名人收到的回复比任何其他类型的发件人都多。这项研究有助于医学专家和政府机构了解出于人口健康目的而在社交媒体上分享的COVID-19内容和交流的类型。这项研究深入了解了社交媒体用户如何在推特上与covid -19相关的信息互动,并提供了关于大流行共享的信息类别的类型学。同行评议本文的同行评议历史可在:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-03-2021-0143/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信