Phenomenological Approach to Consumption Society Analysis: E. Husserl and J. Baudrillard

P. Zaytsev
{"title":"Phenomenological Approach to Consumption Society Analysis: E. Husserl and J. Baudrillard","authors":"P. Zaytsev","doi":"10.35853/ufh-rmp-2019-pc05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of “consumption society” was introduced by J. Baudrillard \nin 1970, when he published the book of this name, so well-loved by researchers. \nToday, “impression society” or “experience consumption society” is getting more \nand more widespread along with the “consumption society” concept. Consumption \nof impressions means a certain industry producing impressions. This paper aims to \nidentify the link between J. Baudrillard’s concept of “consumption society” and \nkey explanatory concepts in the sphere of public production and consumption that \nexisted in his time. The paper poses and answers the question of potential sources \nof Baudrillard’s research approach. It is argued that, despite his “leftist” aesthetics, \nJ. Baudrillard was pretty far from C. Marx. His view of the purpose of consumer \nvalue is explained from E. Husserl’s perspective of the phenomenological methodology. \nWe find attention to the context of contemporary economic ties in works \nby G. Simmel, specifically, in his The Metropolis and Mental Life. The paper \nends with the conclusion that while C. Marx’s contemporary society, with all the \nsignificance of production processes, with its obvious commodity orientation and \nlarge-scale crises caused by commodities overproduction, still included lacunae \nnot directly associated with the world of capital – family, religion, ethnicity, lifestyle \n– the “consumption society” seizes these, too.","PeriodicalId":286196,"journal":{"name":"Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019)","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Man and Power in the Context of Dramatic Changes in Today’s World: Collection of academic papers from the 21st Russian scientific-practical conference (with international participation) (Yekaterinburg, April 12–13, 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35853/ufh-rmp-2019-pc05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion of “consumption society” was introduced by J. Baudrillard in 1970, when he published the book of this name, so well-loved by researchers. Today, “impression society” or “experience consumption society” is getting more and more widespread along with the “consumption society” concept. Consumption of impressions means a certain industry producing impressions. This paper aims to identify the link between J. Baudrillard’s concept of “consumption society” and key explanatory concepts in the sphere of public production and consumption that existed in his time. The paper poses and answers the question of potential sources of Baudrillard’s research approach. It is argued that, despite his “leftist” aesthetics, J. Baudrillard was pretty far from C. Marx. His view of the purpose of consumer value is explained from E. Husserl’s perspective of the phenomenological methodology. We find attention to the context of contemporary economic ties in works by G. Simmel, specifically, in his The Metropolis and Mental Life. The paper ends with the conclusion that while C. Marx’s contemporary society, with all the significance of production processes, with its obvious commodity orientation and large-scale crises caused by commodities overproduction, still included lacunae not directly associated with the world of capital – family, religion, ethnicity, lifestyle – the “consumption society” seizes these, too.
消费社会分析的现象学方法:胡塞尔与鲍德里亚
“消费社会”的概念是由鲍德里亚在1970年提出的,当时他出版了一本名为“消费社会”的书,深受研究者的喜爱。今天,伴随着“消费社会”的概念,“印象社会”或“体验消费社会”越来越普遍。印版消费是指某一印版生产行业。本文旨在确定鲍德里亚的“消费社会”概念与他那个时代存在的公共生产和消费领域的关键解释性概念之间的联系。本文提出并回答了鲍德里亚研究方法的潜在来源问题。有人认为,尽管鲍德里亚具有“左派”美学,但他与马克思相差甚远。从胡塞尔的现象学方法论的角度解释了他的消费价值目的观。我们在G. Simmel的作品中发现了对当代经济联系背景的关注,特别是在他的《大都会与精神生活》中。本文最后得出的结论是,尽管马克思的当代社会具有生产过程的全部意义,具有明显的商品导向和由商品生产过剩引起的大规模危机,但仍然包括与资本世界没有直接联系的空白——家庭、宗教、种族、生活方式——“消费社会”也抓住了这些空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书