Estimation of Land Value using Spatial Statistics: An approach towards Focusing on Real Transaction Land Prices in Korea

Bongjoon Kim, Taeyoung Kim
{"title":"Estimation of Land Value using Spatial Statistics: An approach towards Focusing on Real Transaction Land Prices in Korea","authors":"Bongjoon Kim, Taeyoung Kim","doi":"10.9734/bpi/castr/v15/8599d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"to The present work is aimed to compare OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) and spatial regression models which are methods of calculating the traditional value of land—using data on the practical transaction price of land—and to enhance the applicability of estimation of official land assessment prices set by the Korean government while deducing policy implications for effective implementation. That is, as a way to overcome the limitations of the traditional regression model, we compare various Generalized Regression Models such as SLM (Spatial Lag Model), SEM (Spatial Error Model) with OLS. Consequently, an in-depth diagnosis is conducted to generate a proper estimation model for land pricing, and, also, the analysis focuses on vertical and horizontal equity using COD (Coefficient of Dispersion), COV (Coefficient of Variation) and PRD (Price-Related Differential). The results indicate that SEM is more appropriate than AIC (Akaike info criterion) and SC (Schwarz criterion) in terms of measuring log-likelihood, demonstrating that the spatial autocorrelation model is superior to the traditional regression model. It shows that the SEM is also the best among the tested models with regard to measuring horizontal equity. The spatial econometric model, therefore, is strongly recommended for estimating the prices of land and houses.","PeriodicalId":348731,"journal":{"name":"Current Approaches in Science and Technology Research Vol. 15","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Approaches in Science and Technology Research Vol. 15","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/castr/v15/8599d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

to The present work is aimed to compare OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) and spatial regression models which are methods of calculating the traditional value of land—using data on the practical transaction price of land—and to enhance the applicability of estimation of official land assessment prices set by the Korean government while deducing policy implications for effective implementation. That is, as a way to overcome the limitations of the traditional regression model, we compare various Generalized Regression Models such as SLM (Spatial Lag Model), SEM (Spatial Error Model) with OLS. Consequently, an in-depth diagnosis is conducted to generate a proper estimation model for land pricing, and, also, the analysis focuses on vertical and horizontal equity using COD (Coefficient of Dispersion), COV (Coefficient of Variation) and PRD (Price-Related Differential). The results indicate that SEM is more appropriate than AIC (Akaike info criterion) and SC (Schwarz criterion) in terms of measuring log-likelihood, demonstrating that the spatial autocorrelation model is superior to the traditional regression model. It shows that the SEM is also the best among the tested models with regard to measuring horizontal equity. The spatial econometric model, therefore, is strongly recommended for estimating the prices of land and houses.
基于空间统计的土地价值估算:一种关注韩国实际交易地价的方法
目前的工作旨在比较OLS(普通最小二乘)和空间回归模型,这是计算土地实际交易价格的土地使用数据的传统价值的方法,并提高韩国政府设定的官方土地评估价格估计的适用性,同时推断有效实施的政策影响。也就是说,为了克服传统回归模型的局限性,我们比较了各种广义回归模型,如SLM(空间滞后模型)、SEM(空间误差模型)和OLS。因此,本文进行了深入的诊断,以生成合适的土地定价估计模型,并利用COD(分散系数)、COV(变异系数)和PRD(价格相关差异)对垂直和水平公平性进行了分析。结果表明,SEM比AIC (Akaike info准则)和SC (Schwarz准则)更适合测量对数似然,表明空间自相关模型优于传统回归模型。结果表明,在所有测试模型中,扫描电镜在衡量水平公平方面也是最好的。因此,强烈建议使用空间计量模型来估算土地和房屋的价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信