Trends in Poverty and Inequality Since the Political Transition

S. van der Berg, R. Burger, R. Burger, M. Louw, D. Yu
{"title":"Trends in Poverty and Inequality Since the Political Transition","authors":"S. van der Berg, R. Burger, R. Burger, M. Louw, D. Yu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.982093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a constructed data series and another data series based on the All Media and Products surveys (AMPS), this paper explores trends in poverty and income distribution over the post-transition period. To steer clear of an unduly optimistic conclusion, assumptions are chosen that would tend to show the least decline in poverty. Whilst there were no strong trends in poverty for the period 1995 to 2000, both data series show a considerable decline in poverty after 2000, particularly in the period 2002-2004. Poverty dominance testing shows that this decline is independent of the poverty line chosen or whether the poverty headcount, the poverty ratio or the poverty severity ratio are used as measure. We find likely explanations for this strong and robust decline in poverty in the massive expansion of the social grant system as well as possibly in improved job creation in recent years. Whilst the collective income of the poor (using our definition of poverty) was only R27 billion in 2000, the grants (in constant 2000 Rand values) have expanded by R22 billion since. Even if the grants were not well targeted at the poor (and in the past they have been), a large proportion of this spending must have reached the poor, thus leaving little doubt that poverty must have declined substantially. However, there are limits to the expansion of the grant system as a meaNS of poverty alleviation, pointing to the importance of economic growth with job creation for sustaining the decline in poverty The data also shows that there is substantial progress in economic terms amongst some Black, who have managed to join the middle class. This expansion was most rapid at the upper end of the income spectrum – Blacks constituted about half the growth of this segment of the consumer market in the period 1995-2004.","PeriodicalId":199069,"journal":{"name":"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"165","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 165

Abstract

Using a constructed data series and another data series based on the All Media and Products surveys (AMPS), this paper explores trends in poverty and income distribution over the post-transition period. To steer clear of an unduly optimistic conclusion, assumptions are chosen that would tend to show the least decline in poverty. Whilst there were no strong trends in poverty for the period 1995 to 2000, both data series show a considerable decline in poverty after 2000, particularly in the period 2002-2004. Poverty dominance testing shows that this decline is independent of the poverty line chosen or whether the poverty headcount, the poverty ratio or the poverty severity ratio are used as measure. We find likely explanations for this strong and robust decline in poverty in the massive expansion of the social grant system as well as possibly in improved job creation in recent years. Whilst the collective income of the poor (using our definition of poverty) was only R27 billion in 2000, the grants (in constant 2000 Rand values) have expanded by R22 billion since. Even if the grants were not well targeted at the poor (and in the past they have been), a large proportion of this spending must have reached the poor, thus leaving little doubt that poverty must have declined substantially. However, there are limits to the expansion of the grant system as a meaNS of poverty alleviation, pointing to the importance of economic growth with job creation for sustaining the decline in poverty The data also shows that there is substantial progress in economic terms amongst some Black, who have managed to join the middle class. This expansion was most rapid at the upper end of the income spectrum – Blacks constituted about half the growth of this segment of the consumer market in the period 1995-2004.
政治转型以来的贫困和不平等趋势
本文利用构建的数据系列和基于全媒体和产品调查(AMPS)的另一个数据系列,探讨了转型后时期贫困和收入分配的趋势。为了避免得出过于乐观的结论,我们选择了倾向于显示贫困减少最少的假设。虽然1995年至2000年期间贫穷没有明显的趋势,但这两个数据系列都显示,2000年以后,特别是2002年至2004年期间,贫穷有相当大的下降。贫困优势测试表明,这种下降与选择的贫困线无关,也与是否使用贫困人数、贫困比率或贫困严重程度比率作为衡量标准无关。我们发现,近年来社会补助制度的大规模扩张,以及就业机会的改善,可能是导致贫困人口大幅下降的原因。2000年,穷人(使用我们对贫困的定义)的集体收入仅为270亿兰特,但自那以来,赠款(按2000年兰特不变价值计算)增加了220亿兰特。即使赠款没有很好地以穷人为目标(过去确实如此),这笔支出的很大一部分肯定惠及了穷人,因此毫无疑问,贫困一定大幅减少了。然而,扩大补助制度作为减轻贫困的一种手段是有限制的,这表明经济增长与创造就业机会对于维持贫困下降的重要性。数据还显示,一些黑人在经济方面取得了实质性进展,他们成功地加入了中产阶级。这种扩张在高收入人群中最为迅速——1995年至2004年期间,黑人占这部分消费市场增长的一半左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信