Decision Tree Learning Algorithm and Naïve Bayes Classifier Algorithm Comparative Classification for Mango Pulp Weevil Mating Activity

I. A. P. Banlawe, J. D. dela Cruz, John Christian P. Gaspar, Edrian James I. Gutierrez
{"title":"Decision Tree Learning Algorithm and Naïve Bayes Classifier Algorithm Comparative Classification for Mango Pulp Weevil Mating Activity","authors":"I. A. P. Banlawe, J. D. dela Cruz, John Christian P. Gaspar, Edrian James I. Gutierrez","doi":"10.1109/I2CACIS52118.2021.9495863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mango pulp weevil (MPW) behavior has been long studied but frequency characterization of the said pest in different adult activities was not yet explored. This study focused on the comparative classification of the mating activity of the MPW. Data was collected on a controlled environment with an acoustic chamber built, and the frequency was acquired using a MEMS (Micro Electro-Mechanical Systems) microphone, connected through a microcontroller. Two different algorithms namely the Decision Tree Learning algorithm and Naïve Bayes Classifier algorithm, were tested and compared. Performance in the filtering and optimization of the two algorithms were evaluated in three different stages of mating, the pre-mating, mating and post-mating stage. Comparison of the results of the two algorithms for the premating stage, the Decision tree algorithm reached 75% accuracy while Naïve Bayes algorithm had 95% accuracy, for the mating stage, it was 55% as compared to 70% and in post mating stage, 45% accuracy for the Decision Tree Learning algorithm and 85% for the Naïve Bayes algorithm. These results showed that Naïve Bayes classifier is more accurate in classifying the different stages of MPW activity.","PeriodicalId":210770,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control & Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control & Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CACIS52118.2021.9495863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mango pulp weevil (MPW) behavior has been long studied but frequency characterization of the said pest in different adult activities was not yet explored. This study focused on the comparative classification of the mating activity of the MPW. Data was collected on a controlled environment with an acoustic chamber built, and the frequency was acquired using a MEMS (Micro Electro-Mechanical Systems) microphone, connected through a microcontroller. Two different algorithms namely the Decision Tree Learning algorithm and Naïve Bayes Classifier algorithm, were tested and compared. Performance in the filtering and optimization of the two algorithms were evaluated in three different stages of mating, the pre-mating, mating and post-mating stage. Comparison of the results of the two algorithms for the premating stage, the Decision tree algorithm reached 75% accuracy while Naïve Bayes algorithm had 95% accuracy, for the mating stage, it was 55% as compared to 70% and in post mating stage, 45% accuracy for the Decision Tree Learning algorithm and 85% for the Naïve Bayes algorithm. These results showed that Naïve Bayes classifier is more accurate in classifying the different stages of MPW activity.
决策树学习算法与Naïve贝叶斯分类器算法对芒果果肉象鼻虫交配活动的比较分类
芒果果肉象鼻虫(Mango pulp weevil, MPW)的行为研究已久,但其在不同成虫活动中的频率特征尚未得到探讨。本研究主要对MPW的交配活动进行比较分类。数据是在一个受控的环境中收集的,该环境中建立了一个声学室,并使用MEMS(微机电系统)麦克风获取频率,该麦克风通过微控制器连接。两种不同的算法,即决策树学习算法和Naïve贝叶斯分类器算法,进行了测试和比较。在交配前、交配和交配后三个不同的交配阶段对两种算法的过滤和优化性能进行了评价。比较两种算法的结果,在交配前阶段,决策树算法的准确率达到75%,Naïve贝叶斯算法的准确率为95%,在交配阶段,决策树学习算法的准确率为55%,而在交配后阶段,决策树学习算法的准确率为45%,Naïve贝叶斯算法的准确率为85%。这些结果表明Naïve贝叶斯分类器对MPW活动的不同阶段分类更加准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信