A functional test algorithm for the register forwarding and pipeline interlocking unit in pipelined microprocessors

P. Bernardi, D. Boyang, Lyl M. Ciganda Brasca, E. Sánchez, M. Reorda, M. Grosso, O. Ballan
{"title":"A functional test algorithm for the register forwarding and pipeline interlocking unit in pipelined microprocessors","authors":"P. Bernardi, D. Boyang, Lyl M. Ciganda Brasca, E. Sánchez, M. Reorda, M. Grosso, O. Ballan","doi":"10.1109/IDT.2013.6727120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the result of a previous instruction is needed in the pipeline before it is available, a “data hazard” occurs. Register Forwarding and Pipeline Interlock (RF&PI) are mechanisms suitable to avoid data corruption and to limit the performance penalty caused by data hazards in pipelined microprocessors. Data hazards handling is part of the microprocessor control logic; its test can hardly be achieved with a functional approach, unless a specific test algorithm is adopted. In this paper we analyze the causes for the low functional testability of the RF&PI logic and propose some techniques able to effectively perform its test. In particular, we describe a strategy to perform Software-Based Self-Test (SBST) on the RF&PI unit. The general structure of the unit is analyzed, a suitable test algorithm is proposed and the strategy to observe the test responses is explained. The method can be exploited for test both at the end of manufacturing and in the operational phase. Feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach are demonstrated on both an academic MIPS-like processor and an industrial System-on-Chip based on the Power ArchitectureTM.","PeriodicalId":446826,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2013.6727120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

When the result of a previous instruction is needed in the pipeline before it is available, a “data hazard” occurs. Register Forwarding and Pipeline Interlock (RF&PI) are mechanisms suitable to avoid data corruption and to limit the performance penalty caused by data hazards in pipelined microprocessors. Data hazards handling is part of the microprocessor control logic; its test can hardly be achieved with a functional approach, unless a specific test algorithm is adopted. In this paper we analyze the causes for the low functional testability of the RF&PI logic and propose some techniques able to effectively perform its test. In particular, we describe a strategy to perform Software-Based Self-Test (SBST) on the RF&PI unit. The general structure of the unit is analyzed, a suitable test algorithm is proposed and the strategy to observe the test responses is explained. The method can be exploited for test both at the end of manufacturing and in the operational phase. Feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach are demonstrated on both an academic MIPS-like processor and an industrial System-on-Chip based on the Power ArchitectureTM.
流水线微处理器中寄存器转发和流水线联锁单元的功能测试算法
当管道中需要之前的指令的结果时,就会发生“数据危害”。寄存器转发和管道互锁(RF&PI)是一种适用于避免数据损坏和限制在流水线微处理器中由于数据危害而造成的性能损失的机制。数据危害处理是微处理器控制逻辑的一部分;除非采用特定的测试算法,否则它的测试很难用函数方法来实现。本文分析了RF&PI逻辑功能可测试性低的原因,并提出了一些能够有效进行RF&PI逻辑测试的技术。特别地,我们描述了在RF&PI单元上执行基于软件的自测(SBST)的策略。分析了该装置的一般结构,提出了一种合适的测试算法,并说明了观察测试响应的策略。该方法既可用于制造末期的测试,也可用于运行阶段的测试。在类似mips的学术处理器和基于功率架构的工业片上系统上验证了该方法的可行性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信