Gender bias in the evaluation and management of acute nontraumatic chest pain. The St. Louis Emergency Physicians' Association Research Group.

Family practice research journal Pub Date : 1992-12-01
T F Heston, L M Lewis
{"title":"Gender bias in the evaluation and management of acute nontraumatic chest pain. The St. Louis Emergency Physicians' Association Research Group.","authors":"T F Heston,&nbsp;L M Lewis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior studies suggest a gender-based difference in the management of myocardial ischemia in nonacute settings. We examined whether there was a gender difference in the emergency department evaluation and management of patients with acute chest pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A record review from 10 St. Louis metropolitan emergency departments was done on all patients over 35 years old who presented with acute nonpleuritic, nontraumatic chest pain. We reviewed for the presence of cardiac risk factors, prior cardiac disease, time to physician evaluation, and time to initial electrocardiogram. In the patient subgroup admitted from the emergency department with a diagnosis of myocardial infarction or unstable angina, disposition was noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women waited longer than men for an initial physician evaluation and an initial electrocardiogram. In the patient subgroup with acute myocardial ischemia, a smaller percentage of women than men (56.0% vs 82.8%) were admitted to an intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with acute nonpleuritic, nontraumatic chest pain, women were evaluated and managed less aggressively than men.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"12 4","pages":"383-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior studies suggest a gender-based difference in the management of myocardial ischemia in nonacute settings. We examined whether there was a gender difference in the emergency department evaluation and management of patients with acute chest pain.

Methods: A record review from 10 St. Louis metropolitan emergency departments was done on all patients over 35 years old who presented with acute nonpleuritic, nontraumatic chest pain. We reviewed for the presence of cardiac risk factors, prior cardiac disease, time to physician evaluation, and time to initial electrocardiogram. In the patient subgroup admitted from the emergency department with a diagnosis of myocardial infarction or unstable angina, disposition was noted.

Results: Women waited longer than men for an initial physician evaluation and an initial electrocardiogram. In the patient subgroup with acute myocardial ischemia, a smaller percentage of women than men (56.0% vs 82.8%) were admitted to an intensive care unit.

Conclusion: In patients with acute nonpleuritic, nontraumatic chest pain, women were evaluated and managed less aggressively than men.

急性非创伤性胸痛的评估和治疗中的性别偏见。圣路易斯急诊医师协会研究小组。
背景:先前的研究表明,在非急性心肌缺血的管理中存在性别差异。我们研究了急诊科对急性胸痛患者的评估和管理是否存在性别差异。方法:对圣路易斯10个城市急诊科的所有35岁以上急性非胸膜炎、非创伤性胸痛患者进行记录回顾。我们回顾了心脏危险因素的存在,既往心脏病,到医生评估的时间,以及初始心电图的时间。在急诊科诊断为心肌梗死或不稳定型心绞痛的患者亚组中,注意到处置。结果:女性比男性等待初次医师评估和初次心电图的时间更长。在急性心肌缺血患者亚组中,女性入住重症监护病房的比例低于男性(56.0% vs 82.8%)。结论:在急性非胸膜性、非外伤性胸痛患者中,女性的评估和处理不如男性积极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信