Towards fairer datasets: filtering and balancing the distribution of the people subtree in the ImageNet hierarchy

Kaiyu Yang, Klint Qinami, Li Fei-Fei, Jia Deng, Olga Russakovsky
{"title":"Towards fairer datasets: filtering and balancing the distribution of the people subtree in the ImageNet hierarchy","authors":"Kaiyu Yang, Klint Qinami, Li Fei-Fei, Jia Deng, Olga Russakovsky","doi":"10.1145/3351095.3375709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer vision technology is being used by many but remains representative of only a few. People have reported misbehavior of computer vision models, including offensive prediction results and lower performance for underrepresented groups. Current computer vision models are typically developed using datasets consisting of manually annotated images or videos; the data and label distributions in these datasets are critical to the models' behavior. In this paper, we examine ImageNet, a large-scale ontology of images that has spurred the development of many modern computer vision methods. We consider three key factors within the person subtree of ImageNet that may lead to problematic behavior in downstream computer vision technology: (1) the stagnant concept vocabulary of WordNet, (2) the attempt at exhaustive illustration of all categories with images, and (3) the inequality of representation in the images within concepts. We seek to illuminate the root causes of these concerns and take the first steps to mitigate them constructively.","PeriodicalId":377829,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"228","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3375709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 228

Abstract

Computer vision technology is being used by many but remains representative of only a few. People have reported misbehavior of computer vision models, including offensive prediction results and lower performance for underrepresented groups. Current computer vision models are typically developed using datasets consisting of manually annotated images or videos; the data and label distributions in these datasets are critical to the models' behavior. In this paper, we examine ImageNet, a large-scale ontology of images that has spurred the development of many modern computer vision methods. We consider three key factors within the person subtree of ImageNet that may lead to problematic behavior in downstream computer vision technology: (1) the stagnant concept vocabulary of WordNet, (2) the attempt at exhaustive illustration of all categories with images, and (3) the inequality of representation in the images within concepts. We seek to illuminate the root causes of these concerns and take the first steps to mitigate them constructively.
面向更公平的数据集:过滤和平衡ImageNet层次结构中人员子树的分布
计算机视觉技术正在被许多人使用,但仍然只有少数人具有代表性。人们已经报告了计算机视觉模型的不当行为,包括令人反感的预测结果和对代表性不足的群体的较低表现。当前的计算机视觉模型通常是使用由手动注释的图像或视频组成的数据集开发的;这些数据集中的数据和标签分布对模型的行为至关重要。在本文中,我们研究了ImageNet,这是一个大规模的图像本体,它促进了许多现代计算机视觉方法的发展。我们考虑了ImageNet的人物子树中的三个关键因素,这些因素可能会导致下游计算机视觉技术中的问题行为:(1)WordNet停滞不前的概念词汇,(2)试图用图像详尽地说明所有类别,以及(3)概念中图像表示的不平等。我们试图阐明这些关切的根本原因,并采取初步步骤,建设性地减轻这些关切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信