1 Moving beyond flexner: evolving medical education to stop promoting overdiagnosis

A. Shaughnessy, D. Slawson
{"title":"1 Moving beyond flexner: evolving medical education to stop promoting overdiagnosis","authors":"A. Shaughnessy, D. Slawson","doi":"10.1136/BMJEBM-2018-111070.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current paradigm for making medical care decisions often leads to overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and profound wasting of resources. It was introduced with the overhaul of medical training in the United States and Canada following the report to The Carnegie Foundation by Abraham Flexner in 1910. This report ushered in a rational approach to medical care, with decisions made based on careful understanding of pathophysiology rather than on empirical observation. An evidence-based medicine approach to decision making challenges this tradition, requiring decision making to be based on empirical research results of demonstrated clinical benefit rather than on pathophysiologic reasoning. As a result, evidence-based medicine requires a paradigm shift: Instead of relying on ‘what ought to work,’ it requires identifying ‘what has been shown to work.’ This reorientation requires clinicians to appreciate the role of probability in medicine. It is only with understanding and appreciating roles of uncertainty and probability that the various interventions that lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment can be dropped from one’s practice. However, for many clinicians inculcated into bio-mechanical reasoning to make medical decisions, embracing outcomes-based, probabilistic thinking requires a transformation in their worldview. In this seminar, we will discuss the concept that probabilistic thinking is required to embrace evidence-based medicine, with the goal of moving beyond Flexner to evolve education to stop overdiagnosis and overtreatment decisions at their root. After this brief introduction to the concepts, we will divide attendees into small groups to address five issues where embracing probabilistic thinking can address issues of overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and overuse, including: 1) ‘Action Gone Awry’ (harming people with the best of intentions); 2) ‘Innocent Bystanders’ (people affected by false positive results); 3) ‘Creating the Worried Well’ (the effect of labeling); 4) ‘The Butterfly Effect’ (the unanticipated and unintended consequences of our actions); and, 5) ‘Out of Oz’ (the lure of wishful thinking).","PeriodicalId":201054,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Overdiagnosis Abstracts, August 2018, Copenhagen","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing Overdiagnosis Abstracts, August 2018, Copenhagen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJEBM-2018-111070.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The current paradigm for making medical care decisions often leads to overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and profound wasting of resources. It was introduced with the overhaul of medical training in the United States and Canada following the report to The Carnegie Foundation by Abraham Flexner in 1910. This report ushered in a rational approach to medical care, with decisions made based on careful understanding of pathophysiology rather than on empirical observation. An evidence-based medicine approach to decision making challenges this tradition, requiring decision making to be based on empirical research results of demonstrated clinical benefit rather than on pathophysiologic reasoning. As a result, evidence-based medicine requires a paradigm shift: Instead of relying on ‘what ought to work,’ it requires identifying ‘what has been shown to work.’ This reorientation requires clinicians to appreciate the role of probability in medicine. It is only with understanding and appreciating roles of uncertainty and probability that the various interventions that lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment can be dropped from one’s practice. However, for many clinicians inculcated into bio-mechanical reasoning to make medical decisions, embracing outcomes-based, probabilistic thinking requires a transformation in their worldview. In this seminar, we will discuss the concept that probabilistic thinking is required to embrace evidence-based medicine, with the goal of moving beyond Flexner to evolve education to stop overdiagnosis and overtreatment decisions at their root. After this brief introduction to the concepts, we will divide attendees into small groups to address five issues where embracing probabilistic thinking can address issues of overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and overuse, including: 1) ‘Action Gone Awry’ (harming people with the best of intentions); 2) ‘Innocent Bystanders’ (people affected by false positive results); 3) ‘Creating the Worried Well’ (the effect of labeling); 4) ‘The Butterfly Effect’ (the unanticipated and unintended consequences of our actions); and, 5) ‘Out of Oz’ (the lure of wishful thinking).
1超越flexner:发展医学教育以停止过度诊断
目前的医疗护理决策模式常常导致过度诊断、过度治疗和严重的资源浪费。1910年,亚伯拉罕·弗莱克斯纳(Abraham Flexner)向卡内基基金会(Carnegie Foundation)提交了一份报告,随后,美国和加拿大对医学培训进行了全面改革。该报告开创了一种理性的医疗护理方法,根据对病理生理学的仔细理解而不是根据经验观察作出决定。循证医学的决策方法挑战了这一传统,要求决策基于临床效益的实证研究结果,而不是基于病理生理推理。因此,循证医学需要一种思维模式的转变:不再依赖于“什么应该起作用”,而是需要确定“什么已经被证明是有效的”。这种重新定位要求临床医生认识到概率在医学中的作用。只有理解和欣赏不确定性和概率的作用,才能从实践中消除导致过度诊断和过度治疗的各种干预措施。然而,对于许多被灌输生物力学推理来做出医疗决定的临床医生来说,接受基于结果的概率思维需要他们世界观的转变。在本次研讨会中,我们将讨论概率思维需要接受循证医学的概念,其目标是超越Flexner,发展教育,从根本上阻止过度诊断和过度治疗的决定。在对概念进行简要介绍之后,我们将把与会者分成小组,讨论五个问题,其中采用概率思维可以解决过度诊断、过度治疗和过度使用的问题,包括:1)“行动出错”(出于最好的意图伤害人们);2)“无辜的旁观者”(受假阳性结果影响的人);3)“创造忧虑井”(标签效应);4)“蝴蝶效应”(我们的行为所带来的始料未及的后果);5)《逃出奥兹国》(Out of Oz)(一厢情愿的诱惑)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信