Programming Methods Comparison in Mitsubishi MELFA Robots

B. Kostov, V. Hristov
{"title":"Programming Methods Comparison in Mitsubishi MELFA Robots","authors":"B. Kostov, V. Hristov","doi":"10.1109/ICMERR56497.2022.10097817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper are comparison of programming with functions and libraries versus standard commands in Mitsubishi MELFA industrial robot is explored. In paper are present tests of several different methods for programming (Standard program; GoSub; CallP; Function version 1 (using output and external variable); Function version 2 (using ByRef)). This comparison are done with the purpose of providing method for optimizing the cycle time of the robot job and reducing the cost of software maintenance. The results of the research show that one method is approximately seven times faster than the slowest method. This research paper are suitable for both beginners who will deal with programming and integration of robots as well as advanced ones.","PeriodicalId":302481,"journal":{"name":"2022 7th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research (ICMERR)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 7th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research (ICMERR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMERR56497.2022.10097817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper are comparison of programming with functions and libraries versus standard commands in Mitsubishi MELFA industrial robot is explored. In paper are present tests of several different methods for programming (Standard program; GoSub; CallP; Function version 1 (using output and external variable); Function version 2 (using ByRef)). This comparison are done with the purpose of providing method for optimizing the cycle time of the robot job and reducing the cost of software maintenance. The results of the research show that one method is approximately seven times faster than the slowest method. This research paper are suitable for both beginners who will deal with programming and integration of robots as well as advanced ones.
三菱MELFA机器人编程方法比较
本文对三菱MELFA工业机器人的函数和库编程与标准命令编程进行了比较研究。本文介绍了几种不同的编程方法(标准程序;GoSub;CallP;函数版本1(使用输出和外部变量);函数版本2(使用ByRef))。这样的比较是为了提供优化机器人作业周期时间和降低软件维护成本的方法。研究结果表明,一种方法比最慢的方法快大约7倍。本研究论文既适合初学者,谁将处理编程和集成的机器人,以及高级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信