THE CLINICAL ESTIMATION OF CHEWING TEETH RESTORATIONS MADE BY SANDWICH METHOD

I. Romanenko, V. Klemin, A. Moroz
{"title":"THE CLINICAL ESTIMATION OF CHEWING TEETH RESTORATIONS MADE BY SANDWICH METHOD","authors":"I. Romanenko, V. Klemin, A. Moroz","doi":"10.18481/2077-7566-2023-19-2-39-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photocompositional materials and glass ionomer cements are widely used to restore approximal carious cavities in the \"sandwich technique\", which makes it possible to compensate for the negative properties of both photocomposites and glass ionomers. The purpose of this study was a comparative clinical assessment of the restoration of chewing teeth made by the sandwich method in patients with different levels of oral hygiene. In the course of the study, 49 teeth with cavities of class II according to Black were restored to 33 patients for medium caries by the open \"sandwich\" method. All examined patients were divided into two groups depending on the hygiene index OHI-S. Group I included 18 patients with 26 restorations whose hygiene index for OHI-S did not exceed 1; group II included 15 patients with 23 restorations whose OHI–S index was greater than 1, but who had previously undergone comprehensive professional oral hygiene. Control studies were carried out immediately after recovery, after 6 and 12 months according to the criteria \"marginal adaptation\", \"marginal painting\", \"contact point\" and \"secondary caries\" in accordance with the Ryge scale. As a result of the study, it was found that in patients with the initial unsatisfactory hygienic status of the oral cavity, even in the case of preliminary professional hygiene, the quality of restoration work performed by the \"sandwich\" method is significantly worse than in patients with the initial satisfactory hygienic status, and according to the criterion of \"marginal adaptation\" the differences are significant; the restoration of the contact point from glass ionomer cement showed its inefficiency in comparison with the photocomposite material, regardless of the hygienic status; despite the caries prophylactic effect of glass ionomer cement, secondary caries was detected in patients with the initial unsatisfactory hygienic status of the oral cavity within 12 months.","PeriodicalId":430676,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems in dentistry","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2023-19-2-39-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photocompositional materials and glass ionomer cements are widely used to restore approximal carious cavities in the "sandwich technique", which makes it possible to compensate for the negative properties of both photocomposites and glass ionomers. The purpose of this study was a comparative clinical assessment of the restoration of chewing teeth made by the sandwich method in patients with different levels of oral hygiene. In the course of the study, 49 teeth with cavities of class II according to Black were restored to 33 patients for medium caries by the open "sandwich" method. All examined patients were divided into two groups depending on the hygiene index OHI-S. Group I included 18 patients with 26 restorations whose hygiene index for OHI-S did not exceed 1; group II included 15 patients with 23 restorations whose OHI–S index was greater than 1, but who had previously undergone comprehensive professional oral hygiene. Control studies were carried out immediately after recovery, after 6 and 12 months according to the criteria "marginal adaptation", "marginal painting", "contact point" and "secondary caries" in accordance with the Ryge scale. As a result of the study, it was found that in patients with the initial unsatisfactory hygienic status of the oral cavity, even in the case of preliminary professional hygiene, the quality of restoration work performed by the "sandwich" method is significantly worse than in patients with the initial satisfactory hygienic status, and according to the criterion of "marginal adaptation" the differences are significant; the restoration of the contact point from glass ionomer cement showed its inefficiency in comparison with the photocomposite material, regardless of the hygienic status; despite the caries prophylactic effect of glass ionomer cement, secondary caries was detected in patients with the initial unsatisfactory hygienic status of the oral cavity within 12 months.
夹心法修复咀嚼牙的临床评价
在“夹心技术”中,光合成材料和玻璃离聚体胶合剂被广泛用于修复近似龋洞,这使得补偿光复合材料和玻璃离聚体的负面性质成为可能。本研究的目的是对不同口腔卫生水平患者采用夹心法修复咀嚼牙的临床效果进行比较评估。在研究过程中,对33例中龋患者采用开放式“夹心”法修复了49颗具有Blackⅱ类蛀牙。所有接受检查的患者根据卫生指数ohi分为两组。第一组患者18例,26个修复体,ohi卫生指数不超过1;II组包括15例23个修复体,其ohi指数大于1,但之前接受过全面的专业口腔卫生治疗。对照研究在恢复后立即进行,6个月和12个月后根据Ryge量表的“边缘适应”、“边缘涂漆”、“接触点”和“继发龋”标准进行。研究结果发现,在口腔卫生状况初步不理想的患者中,即使在初步具备专业卫生条件的情况下,“夹心”法进行的修复工作质量也明显差于口腔卫生状况初步满意的患者,且根据“边际适应”标准差异显著;与光复合材料相比,玻璃离子水门合剂的接触点恢复效率较低,无论卫生状况如何;尽管玻璃离子水门合剂有预防龋齿的作用,但在口腔卫生状况不佳的患者中,在12个月内发现了继发龋齿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信