{"title":"A Framework for Quality Flexible Learning Programs","authors":"K. Riele","doi":"10.1163/9789004417311_009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flexible learning programs play a central role in many countries to enable \nsuccessful learning and completion of upper secondary education by young \npeople from socially disadvantaged backgrounds. While the flexible learning program sector is sizeable, it is also somewhat nebulous and fragmented, \nwhich undermines capacity for reflection on what enables success in learning. Research indicates mixed evidence for how well flexible learning programs support young people to gain positive experiences of learning as well \nas valuable outcomes, including educational credentials. The chapter outlines \na Framework of Quality Flexible Learning Programs, based on empirical data \nfrom Australian flexible learning programs. The framework is shaped around \nfour interrelated dimensions: valued outcomes, actions, principles and conditions. Rather than mandating exactly what a flexible learning program should \nlook like, the framework is intended to be applied by programs to their own \nspecific context and purposes in order to facilitate success in learning for all \ntheir students.","PeriodicalId":237272,"journal":{"name":"Harnessing the Transformative Power of Education","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harnessing the Transformative Power of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004417311_009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Flexible learning programs play a central role in many countries to enable
successful learning and completion of upper secondary education by young
people from socially disadvantaged backgrounds. While the flexible learning program sector is sizeable, it is also somewhat nebulous and fragmented,
which undermines capacity for reflection on what enables success in learning. Research indicates mixed evidence for how well flexible learning programs support young people to gain positive experiences of learning as well
as valuable outcomes, including educational credentials. The chapter outlines
a Framework of Quality Flexible Learning Programs, based on empirical data
from Australian flexible learning programs. The framework is shaped around
four interrelated dimensions: valued outcomes, actions, principles and conditions. Rather than mandating exactly what a flexible learning program should
look like, the framework is intended to be applied by programs to their own
specific context and purposes in order to facilitate success in learning for all
their students.