Overcoming evidence gaps on food systems

K. Deconinck, C. Giner, L. Jackson, L. Toyama
{"title":"Overcoming evidence gaps on food systems","authors":"K. Deconinck, C. Giner, L. Jackson, L. Toyama","doi":"10.1787/44ba7574-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food systems are expected to provide food security and nutrition, to contribute to the livelihoods of millions, and to do so in an environmentally sustainable way. The broad outlines of these challenges are clear, and in many cases evidence exists on how better policies can improve the performance of food systems. But there are considerable gaps in data and evidence. This paper provides a panoramic overview of different types of evidence gaps on food systems and their causes, and makes the case that better evidence is needed to enable better policies. At the same time, evidence will never be complete. Policy makers and the research community thus need to adopt a pragmatic approach, focusing on where better evidence can make the biggest difference.","PeriodicalId":141853,"journal":{"name":"OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/44ba7574-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Food systems are expected to provide food security and nutrition, to contribute to the livelihoods of millions, and to do so in an environmentally sustainable way. The broad outlines of these challenges are clear, and in many cases evidence exists on how better policies can improve the performance of food systems. But there are considerable gaps in data and evidence. This paper provides a panoramic overview of different types of evidence gaps on food systems and their causes, and makes the case that better evidence is needed to enable better policies. At the same time, evidence will never be complete. Policy makers and the research community thus need to adopt a pragmatic approach, focusing on where better evidence can make the biggest difference.
克服粮食系统方面的证据差距
人们期望粮食系统能够提供粮食安全和营养,为数百万人的生计做出贡献,并以环境可持续的方式实现这一目标。这些挑战的大致轮廓是明确的,在许多情况下,有证据表明,更好的政策如何能够改善粮食系统的绩效。但在数据和证据方面存在相当大的差距。本文全面概述了关于粮食系统的不同类型的证据差距及其原因,并说明需要更好的证据来实现更好的政策。与此同时,证据永远不会是完整的。因此,政策制定者和研究界需要采取一种务实的方法,把重点放在更好的证据可以产生最大影响的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信