Controversies about the Accounting Treatment of Transfer Fee in the Football Industry

Vladan Pavlović, Srećko Milačić, Isidora Ljumović
{"title":"Controversies about the Accounting Treatment of Transfer Fee in the Football Industry","authors":"Vladan Pavlović, Srećko Milačić, Isidora Ljumović","doi":"10.7595/MANAGEMENT.FON.2014.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investments in sportsmen traditionally were considered as costs, together with transfer fees. From the second \nhalf of the twentieth century transfer fees are considered as assets. However, in the late twentieth and early \ntwenty-first centuries the opinion prevailed that requirements for capitalization are met, and that capitalization \nand disclosure as intangibles are an obligatory procedure in almost all countries with a developed accounting \ntradition. There is the question of justification of the above procedure, having in mind that the contribution \nof the contracted fee for transfers cannot be determined related to the financial benefit of clubs, that players \nare often alienated before the end of the contract, and that the requirements for the control cannot be fully met.","PeriodicalId":116669,"journal":{"name":"Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7595/MANAGEMENT.FON.2014.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Investments in sportsmen traditionally were considered as costs, together with transfer fees. From the second half of the twentieth century transfer fees are considered as assets. However, in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries the opinion prevailed that requirements for capitalization are met, and that capitalization and disclosure as intangibles are an obligatory procedure in almost all countries with a developed accounting tradition. There is the question of justification of the above procedure, having in mind that the contribution of the contracted fee for transfers cannot be determined related to the financial benefit of clubs, that players are often alienated before the end of the contract, and that the requirements for the control cannot be fully met.
关于足球产业转会费会计处理的争议
传统上,对运动员的投资与转会费一起被视为成本。从二十世纪下半叶开始,转让费被视为资产。然而,在20世纪末和21世纪初,普遍认为资本化的要求得到了满足,资本化和作为无形资产的披露在几乎所有具有发达会计传统的国家都是一项强制性程序。考虑到转会合同费用的贡献不能与俱乐部的经济利益相关联,球员经常在合同结束前被疏远,以及控制的要求不能完全满足,上述程序的正当性存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信