Skills for the aspiring surgeon in Australia: A needs assessment

Isaac Ealing, Jonathon Hong, S. Whereat, Lily Builth-Snoad, Vijidha Shree, Jerome Laurence
{"title":"Skills for the aspiring surgeon in Australia: A needs assessment","authors":"Isaac Ealing, Jonathon Hong, S. Whereat, Lily Builth-Snoad, Vijidha Shree, Jerome Laurence","doi":"10.11157/fohpe.v24i2.658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The increasing duration of time before the commencement of formal surgical education training (SET) in Australia has emphasised the need for pre-SET “aspiring” surgical trainees to develop greater competency in both generic and specialty-specific skills to fulfil these public hospital positions, however there is no formalised curriculum or guide. This paper investigates current inconsistencies in the training of Australian pre-SET aspiring surgical trainees and attempts to define which skills are required.\nMethods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with pre-SET supervisors in general and specialty surgery fields at a large tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, to assess expectations and competencies of pre-SET surgical trainees. A mixed-method analysis was used with inductive content analysis used for the rich interview data and quantitative analysis of 5-point Likert scale scores for the essential skills syllabus and eligibility requirements.\nResults: Eighteen interviews were conducted. Three major themes arose from inductive content analysis: participants perceived that pre-SET trainees met basic expectations, significant variability in skill level exists between trainees, and simulation was suggested as a potential solution to address gaps in training. Quantitative analysis of Likert scores suggests that trainee competency was inadequate (or not required) for several skills. For general surgery, trainee competency was deemed inadequate for proctoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy and appendicectomy.\nConclusions: There is a critical need to clearly define the skills expected of pre-SET trainees and their role within the healthcare system. This study provides insights into the content of that skillset, which could be used to design relevant and useful training programs for pre-SET trainees. The value of simulation training was universally noted by participants. They believed that this could improve competency for pre-SET trainees in technical and non-technical skills.","PeriodicalId":382787,"journal":{"name":"Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v24i2.658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing duration of time before the commencement of formal surgical education training (SET) in Australia has emphasised the need for pre-SET “aspiring” surgical trainees to develop greater competency in both generic and specialty-specific skills to fulfil these public hospital positions, however there is no formalised curriculum or guide. This paper investigates current inconsistencies in the training of Australian pre-SET aspiring surgical trainees and attempts to define which skills are required. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with pre-SET supervisors in general and specialty surgery fields at a large tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, to assess expectations and competencies of pre-SET surgical trainees. A mixed-method analysis was used with inductive content analysis used for the rich interview data and quantitative analysis of 5-point Likert scale scores for the essential skills syllabus and eligibility requirements. Results: Eighteen interviews were conducted. Three major themes arose from inductive content analysis: participants perceived that pre-SET trainees met basic expectations, significant variability in skill level exists between trainees, and simulation was suggested as a potential solution to address gaps in training. Quantitative analysis of Likert scores suggests that trainee competency was inadequate (or not required) for several skills. For general surgery, trainee competency was deemed inadequate for proctoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy and appendicectomy. Conclusions: There is a critical need to clearly define the skills expected of pre-SET trainees and their role within the healthcare system. This study provides insights into the content of that skillset, which could be used to design relevant and useful training programs for pre-SET trainees. The value of simulation training was universally noted by participants. They believed that this could improve competency for pre-SET trainees in technical and non-technical skills.
澳大利亚有抱负的外科医生的技能:需求评估
简介:在澳大利亚,正规外科教育培训(SET)开始前的时间越来越长,这强调了对pre-SET“有抱负”的外科学员需要在通用和专业技能方面发展更大的能力,以胜任这些公立医院的职位,然而没有正式的课程或指南。本文调查了目前澳大利亚pre-SET有抱负的外科受训者培训中的不一致之处,并试图定义哪些技能是必需的。方法:我们对澳大利亚悉尼一家大型三级教学医院的普通外科和专科外科的预set主管进行了半结构化访谈,以评估预set外科学员的期望和能力。采用混合分析方法,对丰富的访谈数据进行归纳内容分析,对基本技能大纲和资格要求的5分李克特量表得分进行定量分析。结果:共进行了18次访谈。归纳性内容分析产生了三个主要主题:参与者认为pre-SET学员满足基本期望;学员之间存在显著的技能水平差异;建议将模拟作为解决培训差距的潜在解决方案。李克特分数的定量分析表明,受训者的能力在一些技能上是不足的(或不是必需的)。对于普通外科,实习生的能力被认为不足以进行直肠镜检查,刚性乙状结肠镜检查和阑尾切除术。结论:迫切需要明确定义pre-SET受训人员的预期技能及其在医疗保健系统中的作用。本研究提供了对该技能集内容的见解,可用于为pre-SET受训者设计相关且有用的培训计划。参加者普遍注意到模拟训练的价值。他们认为这可以提高pre-SET学员在技术和非技术技能方面的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信