Expenditure Elasticity and Inequality Over the Business Cycle

Ana Danieli
{"title":"Expenditure Elasticity and Inequality Over the Business Cycle","authors":"Ana Danieli","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3593499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I analyze a new channel through which real labor income inequality can vary over the business cycle arising from heterogeneity in the households exposure to different sectors in their consumption and labor choices. This heterogeneous exposure has two sources of origin both are empirically documented in this paper. First, low income households consume less from sectors with high expenditure elasticity and are therefore less exposed to fluctuations in their prices. Second, low income households tend to work more in service occupations that are used most intensely in sectors with high expenditure elasticity and are therefore more exposed to labor demand fluctuation in these sectors. While the mechanism is relevant to any shock that increases income, I focus my analysis on monetary policy shocks that are reliably identified using high frequency data. In my analysis I establish that as a response to a monetary policy shock the aggregate value added share of sectors with high expenditure elasticity increases. This implies an increase in:<br><br>(1) the relative prices of goods or services in these sectors <br><br>(2) the relative income share of employees in these sectors. <br><br>Both effects result in an increase in the relative real wage of low income households that are less exposed to the increase in prices while more exposed to the increase in wages. I use a TANK model with non-homothetic preferences and sector heterogeneity to quantify the effects of this mechanism and evaluate how it has change over time with changes in sectoral and occupational composition.","PeriodicalId":244949,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3593499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I analyze a new channel through which real labor income inequality can vary over the business cycle arising from heterogeneity in the households exposure to different sectors in their consumption and labor choices. This heterogeneous exposure has two sources of origin both are empirically documented in this paper. First, low income households consume less from sectors with high expenditure elasticity and are therefore less exposed to fluctuations in their prices. Second, low income households tend to work more in service occupations that are used most intensely in sectors with high expenditure elasticity and are therefore more exposed to labor demand fluctuation in these sectors. While the mechanism is relevant to any shock that increases income, I focus my analysis on monetary policy shocks that are reliably identified using high frequency data. In my analysis I establish that as a response to a monetary policy shock the aggregate value added share of sectors with high expenditure elasticity increases. This implies an increase in:

(1) the relative prices of goods or services in these sectors

(2) the relative income share of employees in these sectors.

Both effects result in an increase in the relative real wage of low income households that are less exposed to the increase in prices while more exposed to the increase in wages. I use a TANK model with non-homothetic preferences and sector heterogeneity to quantify the effects of this mechanism and evaluate how it has change over time with changes in sectoral and occupational composition.
经济周期中的支出弹性和不平等
我分析了一个新的渠道,通过这个渠道,实际劳动收入不平等可以随着商业周期的变化而变化,这是由于家庭在消费和劳动选择中暴露于不同部门的异质性造成的。这种异质暴露有两个来源,这两个来源在本文中都有经验记录。首先,低收入家庭较少消费支出弹性高的部门,因此较少受其价格波动的影响。第二,低收入家庭往往更多地从事在支出弹性高的部门中使用最密集的服务职业,因此更容易受到这些部门劳动力需求波动的影响。虽然这种机制与任何增加收入的冲击有关,但我的分析重点是使用高频数据可靠地识别的货币政策冲击。在我的分析中,我确定,作为对货币政策冲击的反应,具有高支出弹性的部门的总增加值份额增加了。这意味着:(1)这些部门的商品或服务的相对价格(2)这些部门的雇员的相对收入份额。这两种效应都会导致低收入家庭的相对实际工资增加,这些家庭受价格上涨的影响较小,而受工资上涨的影响更大。我使用一个具有非同质偏好和部门异质性的TANK模型来量化这一机制的影响,并评估它是如何随着时间的推移随着部门和职业构成的变化而变化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信