Network control and usage-based charging: is charging for volume adequate?

C. Courcoubetis, V. Siris, G. Stamoulis
{"title":"Network control and usage-based charging: is charging for volume adequate?","authors":"C. Courcoubetis, V. Siris, G. Stamoulis","doi":"10.1145/288994.289012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been extensive research on the applierdion of the efFective bandwidth concept for quantifying resource usage in order to create simple yet eRective usag~based charging schemes with desirable incentive properties. This research has shown that simple charging schemes which involve two measurements, time and volume, can serve their purpose well by producing adequate approximations of the effective usage of a lmrsty trailic stream. An issne that has not been addressed in detail is the relation between the type of admission control meehanism the network uses and the definition of efective usage. b particular, the above charging schemes assume “static” Connection Admission Control (C.4C). Ii contrast to static C..4C, “dynamic” C.4C strategies utilize on-line measurements of the actual load, hence can achieve mnrihhigher utilization. We argue that under such dynamic strategies the efective usage concept mnst be redefined, and that when control actions occur at faster time scales than the burstiness of the sources, the eifective usage approaches the mean rate of the sonrces. In addition to jnstifjing the potential use of simple ~olnrm+based tarii%, the above justifies the deployment of sophisticated dynamic admission control mechanism s, since these result in more competitive prices.","PeriodicalId":147821,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Information and Computation Economies","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Information and Computation Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/288994.289012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

There has been extensive research on the applierdion of the efFective bandwidth concept for quantifying resource usage in order to create simple yet eRective usag~based charging schemes with desirable incentive properties. This research has shown that simple charging schemes which involve two measurements, time and volume, can serve their purpose well by producing adequate approximations of the effective usage of a lmrsty trailic stream. An issne that has not been addressed in detail is the relation between the type of admission control meehanism the network uses and the definition of efective usage. b particular, the above charging schemes assume “static” Connection Admission Control (C.4C). Ii contrast to static C..4C, “dynamic” C.4C strategies utilize on-line measurements of the actual load, hence can achieve mnrihhigher utilization. We argue that under such dynamic strategies the efective usage concept mnst be redefined, and that when control actions occur at faster time scales than the burstiness of the sources, the eifective usage approaches the mean rate of the sonrces. In addition to jnstifjing the potential use of simple ~olnrm+based tarii%, the above justifies the deployment of sophisticated dynamic admission control mechanism s, since these result in more competitive prices.
网络控制和基于使用的收费:按容量收费是否足够?
人们对有效带宽概念的应用进行了广泛的研究,以量化资源使用情况,以创建简单而有效的基于使用的收费方案,并具有理想的激励特性。这项研究表明,简单的充电方案,包括两个测量,时间和体积,可以很好地服务于他们的目的,产生足够的近似的有效利用一个多车道流。一个尚未详细讨论的问题是网络使用的准入控制机制类型与有效使用的定义之间的关系。b特别地,上述收费方案采用“静态”连接允许控制(C.4C)。对比;对比;对比;4C,“动态”C.4C策略利用实际负载的在线测量,因此可以实现更高的利用率。我们认为,在这种动态策略下,必须重新定义有效利用的概念,并且当控制动作发生在比源爆发更快的时间尺度上时,有效利用接近于源的平均速率。除了阻止简单的基于价格的关税的潜在使用之外,上述情况证明了部署复杂的动态准入控制机制是合理的,因为这些机制会导致更具竞争力的价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信