The Public Enforcement of Directors' Duties

A. Keay
{"title":"The Public Enforcement of Directors' Duties","authors":"A. Keay","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2201598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The general duties owed by directors to their companies are a critical element of company law overall, and corporate governance in particular. If these duties are breached the board, acting on behalf of the company, is empowered to decide whether to take action against the miscreant directors. If no action is taken by the board UK law essentially leaves it to private parties to take any action against the miscreants. The parties who can take action are the shareholders of the miscreant director’s company, and they must do so pursuant to a derivative action. This might be seen as the primary private enforcement mechanism used in the UK when directors commit breaches. This is in line with the UK’s general approach to fostering a private rather than a public approach to corporate governance. It appears that there have been relatively few derivative actions commenced by shareholders, probably because of the many disincentives that confront shareholders. Given this state of affairs the aim of this paper is to investigate whether there is a need for the public enforcement of duties so that there is an enhancement of corporate governance in the UK. This then leads to us asking whether it is feasible and/or desirable to grant powers to a public authority to take enforcement action in appropriate cases.","PeriodicalId":307190,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2201598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The general duties owed by directors to their companies are a critical element of company law overall, and corporate governance in particular. If these duties are breached the board, acting on behalf of the company, is empowered to decide whether to take action against the miscreant directors. If no action is taken by the board UK law essentially leaves it to private parties to take any action against the miscreants. The parties who can take action are the shareholders of the miscreant director’s company, and they must do so pursuant to a derivative action. This might be seen as the primary private enforcement mechanism used in the UK when directors commit breaches. This is in line with the UK’s general approach to fostering a private rather than a public approach to corporate governance. It appears that there have been relatively few derivative actions commenced by shareholders, probably because of the many disincentives that confront shareholders. Given this state of affairs the aim of this paper is to investigate whether there is a need for the public enforcement of duties so that there is an enhancement of corporate governance in the UK. This then leads to us asking whether it is feasible and/or desirable to grant powers to a public authority to take enforcement action in appropriate cases.
董事职责的公开执行
董事对公司的一般义务是公司法的一个重要组成部分,尤其是公司治理。如果违反这些职责,董事会有权代表公司决定是否对违规董事采取行动。如果董事会不采取任何行动,英国法律基本上会让私人团体对不法分子采取任何行动。可以采取行动的各方是不法董事公司的股东,他们必须根据派生诉讼这样做。这可能被视为英国董事违规时使用的主要私人执法机制。这与英国培养私人(而非公共)公司治理方式的总体做法一致。股东发起的衍生诉讼似乎相对较少,这可能是因为股东面临许多不利因素。鉴于这种情况,本文的目的是调查是否有必要公开执行职责,以便在英国加强公司治理。因此,我们不禁要问,在适当的情况下,授予公共当局采取执法行动的权力是否可行和/或可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书