“Yours in Indian Unity”: Moderate National Indigenous Organisations and the U.S.-Canada Border in the Red Power Era

Reetta Humalajoki
{"title":"“Yours in Indian Unity”: Moderate National Indigenous Organisations and the U.S.-Canada Border in the Red Power Era","authors":"Reetta Humalajoki","doi":"10.1080/14775700.2020.1735920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Historiography on the Red Power era has to-date largely focused on the direct action protests of the American Indian Movement, while overlooking the continuing political lobbying and transnational work of more moderate Native rights organisations. This article argues that the National Congress of American Indians in the U.S. and the National Indian Brotherhood in Canada rhetorically challenged the U.S.-Canada border, even establishing a Joint Agreement to foster collaboration across it. However, while their leaders purported to challenge nation-state borders, in practice the collaboration between the two organisations adhered to the settler-colonial structures dominant in North America. Shaped by these federal ties, the exchange was ultimately unable to achieve its aim of working towards self-determination through mutual cooperation. Moderate Indigenous organisations remain dependent on federal structures to operate, thus limiting their ability to effectively organise across settler-state borders.","PeriodicalId":114563,"journal":{"name":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2020.1735920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Historiography on the Red Power era has to-date largely focused on the direct action protests of the American Indian Movement, while overlooking the continuing political lobbying and transnational work of more moderate Native rights organisations. This article argues that the National Congress of American Indians in the U.S. and the National Indian Brotherhood in Canada rhetorically challenged the U.S.-Canada border, even establishing a Joint Agreement to foster collaboration across it. However, while their leaders purported to challenge nation-state borders, in practice the collaboration between the two organisations adhered to the settler-colonial structures dominant in North America. Shaped by these federal ties, the exchange was ultimately unable to achieve its aim of working towards self-determination through mutual cooperation. Moderate Indigenous organisations remain dependent on federal structures to operate, thus limiting their ability to effectively organise across settler-state borders.
“你的印第安人团结”:红色力量时代温和的民族土著组织和美国-加拿大边境
迄今为止,关于红色力量时代的史学研究主要集中在美国印第安人运动的直接抗议行动上,而忽略了更温和的土著权利组织持续的政治游说和跨国工作。本文认为,美国的美国印第安人全国代表大会和加拿大的全国印第安人兄弟会在言辞上挑战美加边界,甚至建立了一个联合协议来促进跨界合作。然而,尽管他们的领导人声称要挑战民族国家的边界,但在实践中,两个组织之间的合作坚持在北美占主导地位的定居者-殖民地结构。受这些联邦关系的影响,该交易所最终无法实现通过相互合作实现自决的目标。温和的土著组织仍然依赖联邦机构运作,因此限制了他们跨越移民-州边界有效组织的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信