Process Mining Methodology for Digital Processes under Smart Campus Concept

Onur Doğan, Esra CENGİZ TIRPAN
{"title":"Process Mining Methodology for Digital Processes under Smart Campus Concept","authors":"Onur Doğan, Esra CENGİZ TIRPAN","doi":"10.35193/bseufbd.1162284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital transformation affects universities as well as many industries. Universities are increasingly using various digital resources and systems to manage their knowledge. The smart campus, on the other hand, supports informed decision-making by integrating these resources and systems. Process mining provides real insights for digital transformation, allowing processes to be examined more transparently. This study aims to examine the proposed project implementation processes related to the smart university with the process mining methodology. For this purpose, 32 completed projects submitted to İzmir Bakırçay University Scientific Research Projects Coordinatorship (BAPK) with the proposed methodology adapted from Deming's continuous improvement cycle were examined. The data are taken from two different pages in the project automation system. According to the research findings, Projects are grouped into three categories: Guided Projects (GDM, 5 projects), Graduate Thesis Projects (TEZ, 5 projects), and Career Start Support Projects (KBP, 22 projects). 40.6% (13 projects) of the applications went directly to the project review stage, while 19 (59.4%) needed procedural correction. Considering the time from the creation of the application of 32 projects to the signing of the contract, it is seen that the arithmetic average of the cycle time is 15.1 weeks, and the median average is 52.5 days. The notable difference between arithmetic and median mean is that very few projects are of long duration. Procedural adjustments affect project evaluation cycle time by an additional 14 days. The carelessness or lack of knowledge of the applicants extends the cycle time of the process from 15 days to 53 days. The total duration of unnecessary waiting time in the process is 17 days. This study primarily proposes that non-digital processes should be digitized as soon as possible.","PeriodicalId":325089,"journal":{"name":"Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1162284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital transformation affects universities as well as many industries. Universities are increasingly using various digital resources and systems to manage their knowledge. The smart campus, on the other hand, supports informed decision-making by integrating these resources and systems. Process mining provides real insights for digital transformation, allowing processes to be examined more transparently. This study aims to examine the proposed project implementation processes related to the smart university with the process mining methodology. For this purpose, 32 completed projects submitted to İzmir Bakırçay University Scientific Research Projects Coordinatorship (BAPK) with the proposed methodology adapted from Deming's continuous improvement cycle were examined. The data are taken from two different pages in the project automation system. According to the research findings, Projects are grouped into three categories: Guided Projects (GDM, 5 projects), Graduate Thesis Projects (TEZ, 5 projects), and Career Start Support Projects (KBP, 22 projects). 40.6% (13 projects) of the applications went directly to the project review stage, while 19 (59.4%) needed procedural correction. Considering the time from the creation of the application of 32 projects to the signing of the contract, it is seen that the arithmetic average of the cycle time is 15.1 weeks, and the median average is 52.5 days. The notable difference between arithmetic and median mean is that very few projects are of long duration. Procedural adjustments affect project evaluation cycle time by an additional 14 days. The carelessness or lack of knowledge of the applicants extends the cycle time of the process from 15 days to 53 days. The total duration of unnecessary waiting time in the process is 17 days. This study primarily proposes that non-digital processes should be digitized as soon as possible.
智慧校园下数字化流程的流程挖掘方法
数字化转型不仅影响着大学,也影响着许多行业。大学越来越多地使用各种数字资源和系统来管理他们的知识。另一方面,智能校园通过整合这些资源和系统来支持明智的决策。流程挖掘为数字化转型提供了真正的见解,允许更透明地检查流程。本研究旨在以流程挖掘方法检视与智慧大学相关的拟议专案实施流程。为此目的,审查了提交给İzmir Bakırçay大学科学研究项目协调员(BAPK)的32个已完成的项目,这些项目采用了从戴明的持续改进周期改编的拟议方法。数据取自项目自动化系统中的两个不同页面。根据研究结果,项目分为三类:指导项目(GDM, 5个项目)、研究生论文项目(TEZ, 5个项目)和创业支持项目(KBP, 22个项目)。40.6%(13个项目)的申请直接进入项目审查阶段,19个(59.4%)的申请需要程序纠正。考虑到从32个项目的申请创建到签订合同的时间,可以看出周期时间的算术平均值为15.1周,平均值的中位数为52.5天。算术平均数和中位数平均数之间的显著区别是,很少有项目是长时间的。程序调整对项目评估周期的影响增加了14天。申请人的粗心大意或缺乏知识将整个过程的周期从15天延长到53天。在此过程中,不必要的等待时间总计为17天。本研究主要提出非数字化流程应尽快实现数字化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信