Evaluation of Factors Affecting Implementation of Green Public Procurement Governments in Laikipia County Government, Kenya.

Elijah Mwangi Ngunjiri
{"title":"Evaluation of Factors Affecting Implementation of Green Public Procurement Governments in Laikipia County Government, Kenya.","authors":"Elijah Mwangi Ngunjiri","doi":"10.26668/BUSINESSREVIEW/2019.V4I1.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Green Public Procurement has been used as a tool to achieve environmental objectives by some countries especially in Europe. Public procurement in Kenya is estimated to account for between 70 and 80 percent of the national budget.  This gives the government purchasing power to influence manufacturing and supply of green products for sustainable development. County governments in Kenya are allocated between 15 and 45 percent of the total country’s income.  Despite all these finances Counties possess, many of them do not fully use their purchasing power to achieve environmental objectives. Laikipia County for example, did very well on procurement activities to be ranked the best performing entity in public procurement in Kenya in 2014, yet it did not have a similar identity on Green Public Procurement. It is this research gap that this study sought to fill. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting implementation of Green Public Procurement in Laikipia County government. The study was guided by knowledge gap and buyers’ perception on green products as independent variables and implementation of Green Public Procurement as the dependant variable. Descriptive research design was applied in this study.  The study targeted County governments in Kenya. The study population was 45 employees from Laikipia County government drawn from procurement and finance department. Primary data was collected by use of a semi structured questionnaire.  The questionnaire was self administered. Descriptive statistics and statistical model of multiple regression were used in analysis of data .The study established that knowledge gap (0.561) and buyer’s perception on GPP (0.143) had a positive effect on GPP implementation with knowledge gap as the major one. The study recommends County governments to organize for compulsory training of its staff on GPP. They should conduct lifecycle costing of all products procured by the County governments so as to create the right perception on these products. ","PeriodicalId":304875,"journal":{"name":"Intern. Journal of Profess. Bus. Review","volume":"C-35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intern. Journal of Profess. Bus. Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26668/BUSINESSREVIEW/2019.V4I1.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Green Public Procurement has been used as a tool to achieve environmental objectives by some countries especially in Europe. Public procurement in Kenya is estimated to account for between 70 and 80 percent of the national budget.  This gives the government purchasing power to influence manufacturing and supply of green products for sustainable development. County governments in Kenya are allocated between 15 and 45 percent of the total country’s income.  Despite all these finances Counties possess, many of them do not fully use their purchasing power to achieve environmental objectives. Laikipia County for example, did very well on procurement activities to be ranked the best performing entity in public procurement in Kenya in 2014, yet it did not have a similar identity on Green Public Procurement. It is this research gap that this study sought to fill. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting implementation of Green Public Procurement in Laikipia County government. The study was guided by knowledge gap and buyers’ perception on green products as independent variables and implementation of Green Public Procurement as the dependant variable. Descriptive research design was applied in this study.  The study targeted County governments in Kenya. The study population was 45 employees from Laikipia County government drawn from procurement and finance department. Primary data was collected by use of a semi structured questionnaire.  The questionnaire was self administered. Descriptive statistics and statistical model of multiple regression were used in analysis of data .The study established that knowledge gap (0.561) and buyer’s perception on GPP (0.143) had a positive effect on GPP implementation with knowledge gap as the major one. The study recommends County governments to organize for compulsory training of its staff on GPP. They should conduct lifecycle costing of all products procured by the County governments so as to create the right perception on these products. 
肯尼亚莱基皮亚县政府实施绿色公共采购的影响因素评价
绿色公共采购已被一些国家,特别是欧洲国家用作实现环境目标的工具。据估计,肯尼亚的公共采购占国家预算的70%至80%。这赋予了政府购买力,以影响绿色产品的制造和供应,促进可持续发展。肯尼亚的县政府被分配到国家总收入的15%到45%。尽管这些国家拥有所有这些财政,他们中的许多人并没有充分利用他们的购买力来实现环境目标。例如,莱基皮亚县在2014年的采购活动中表现非常好,被评为肯尼亚公共采购表现最好的实体,但它在绿色公共采购方面却没有类似的身份。本研究试图填补的正是这一研究空白。摘要本研究旨在探讨影响莱基皮亚县政府实施绿色公共采购的因素。研究以知识差距和购买者对绿色产品的认知为自变量,以绿色公共采购的实施为因变量。本研究采用描述性研究设计。这项研究的目标是肯尼亚的县政府。研究对象为莱基皮亚县政府采购和财务部门的45名工作人员。主要数据收集采用半结构化问卷。问卷是自行填写的。采用描述性统计和多元回归统计模型对数据进行分析,研究发现知识差距(0.561)和购买者对GPP的认知(0.143)对GPP实施有正向影响,其中知识差距是主要影响因素。该研究建议县政府组织对其工作人员进行GPP强制性培训。他们应该对县政府采购的所有产品进行生命周期成本计算,从而对这些产品产生正确的认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信