Cyber-Crime Detection: Experimental Techniques Comparison Analysis

Ebraheem Fahad Aljarboua, Marina Bte Md. Din, Asmidar Abu Bakar
{"title":"Cyber-Crime Detection: Experimental Techniques Comparison Analysis","authors":"Ebraheem Fahad Aljarboua, Marina Bte Md. Din, Asmidar Abu Bakar","doi":"10.1109/IVIT55443.2022.10033332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cyber-crime is one of the main problems the world face, and machine learning plays a key part in contemporary operating systems for giving better transformation in the security environment and cybercrime detection. While detecting cybercrimes is difficult, it is possible to gain advantages from machine learning to generate models to assist in predicting and detecting cybercrimes. The researchers have proven that the majority of the models can work effectively in identifying cybercrime, they can span from 70% to 90% in accuracy measuring. The objective of this research paper is to conduct experimental techniques comparison analysis for cyber-crime detection by reviewing all possible machine learning algorithms for automatic detection. The key focus of the study is on the use of eight classifiers models which are Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), K-nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Multiple layer perception (MLP). From the experiment conducted, the high prediction came from MLP which is 96% accuracy of the cyber-crime methods based on existing cyber-crime data.","PeriodicalId":325667,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Visualization, Informatics and Technology Conference (IVIT)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Visualization, Informatics and Technology Conference (IVIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVIT55443.2022.10033332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cyber-crime is one of the main problems the world face, and machine learning plays a key part in contemporary operating systems for giving better transformation in the security environment and cybercrime detection. While detecting cybercrimes is difficult, it is possible to gain advantages from machine learning to generate models to assist in predicting and detecting cybercrimes. The researchers have proven that the majority of the models can work effectively in identifying cybercrime, they can span from 70% to 90% in accuracy measuring. The objective of this research paper is to conduct experimental techniques comparison analysis for cyber-crime detection by reviewing all possible machine learning algorithms for automatic detection. The key focus of the study is on the use of eight classifiers models which are Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), K-nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Multiple layer perception (MLP). From the experiment conducted, the high prediction came from MLP which is 96% accuracy of the cyber-crime methods based on existing cyber-crime data.
网络犯罪检测:实验技术对比分析
网络犯罪是当今世界面临的主要问题之一,机器学习在当代操作系统中发挥着关键作用,可以更好地改造安全环境和检测网络犯罪。虽然检测网络犯罪很困难,但可以从机器学习中获得优势,生成模型来帮助预测和检测网络犯罪。研究人员已经证明,大多数模型可以有效地识别网络犯罪,它们的测量精度可以从70%到90%不等。本研究的目的是通过回顾所有可能的自动检测机器学习算法,对网络犯罪检测进行实验技术比较分析。该研究的重点是使用八种分类器模型,即逻辑回归(LR)、决策树(DT)、k近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、随机森林(RF)、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)和多层感知(MLP)。从实验结果来看,基于现有的网络犯罪数据,MLP的预测准确率高达96%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信