{"title":"Transnational Dealings - Morrison Continues to Make Waves","authors":"Marc I. Steinberg, K. Flanagan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2205416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. drastically altered the landscape for transnational securities litigation and the way that courts determine proper application of a statute concerning a transnational claim. The Supreme Court’s characterization of extraterritoriality under the Securities Exchange Act as a merits-based inquiry has led to a reexamination of limitations under other federal statutes that were previously thought to be jurisdictional issues. Significantly, Morrison created a road map for courts to follow when the extraterritoriality of a statute is brought into question. The key to proper application of a statute is to decipher the minimum U.S. contacts required to state a transnational claim. The tests developed addressing this inquiry are critical in discerning the boundaries of U.S. law at a time when transnational dealings are prevalent.","PeriodicalId":375754,"journal":{"name":"Public International Law eJournal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public International Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2205416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. drastically altered the landscape for transnational securities litigation and the way that courts determine proper application of a statute concerning a transnational claim. The Supreme Court’s characterization of extraterritoriality under the Securities Exchange Act as a merits-based inquiry has led to a reexamination of limitations under other federal statutes that were previously thought to be jurisdictional issues. Significantly, Morrison created a road map for courts to follow when the extraterritoriality of a statute is brought into question. The key to proper application of a statute is to decipher the minimum U.S. contacts required to state a transnational claim. The tests developed addressing this inquiry are critical in discerning the boundaries of U.S. law at a time when transnational dealings are prevalent.
莫里森诉澳大利亚国民银行案(Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.)彻底改变了跨国证券诉讼的格局,也改变了法院判定有关跨国索赔的法规是否适用的方式。最高法院将《证券交易法》下的治外法权定性为基于功绩的调查,导致了对其他联邦法规下的限制的重新审查,这些限制以前被认为是管辖权问题。重要的是,莫里森为法院在法规的治外法权受到质疑时制定了一个路线图。适当适用法规的关键是要理解陈述跨国索赔所需的最低限度的美国联系。在跨国交易盛行的时代,为解决这一问题而开发的测试对于辨别美国法律的界限至关重要。