Comparison of Clustering Algorithms for Learning Analytics with Educational Datasets

Álvaro Martínez Navarro, P. Moreno-Ger
{"title":"Comparison of Clustering Algorithms for Learning Analytics with Educational Datasets","authors":"Álvaro Martínez Navarro, P. Moreno-Ger","doi":"10.9781/ijimai.2018.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning Analytics is becoming a key tool for the analysis and improvement of digital education processes, and \nits potential benefit grows with the size of the student cohorts generating data. In the context of Open Education, \nthe potentially massive student cohorts and the global audience represent a great opportunity for significant \nanalyses and breakthroughs in the field of learning analytics. However, these potentially huge datasets require \nproper analysis techniques, and different algorithms, tools and approaches may perform better in this specific \ncontext. In this work, we compare different clustering algorithms using an educational dataset. We start by \nidentifying the most relevant algorithms in Learning Analytics and benchmark them to determine, according to \ninternal validation and stability measurements, which algorithms perform better. We analyzed seven algorithms, \nand determined that K-means and PAM were the best performers among partition algorithms, and DIANA was \nthe best performer among hierarchical algorithms","PeriodicalId":143152,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell.","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2018.02.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Learning Analytics is becoming a key tool for the analysis and improvement of digital education processes, and its potential benefit grows with the size of the student cohorts generating data. In the context of Open Education, the potentially massive student cohorts and the global audience represent a great opportunity for significant analyses and breakthroughs in the field of learning analytics. However, these potentially huge datasets require proper analysis techniques, and different algorithms, tools and approaches may perform better in this specific context. In this work, we compare different clustering algorithms using an educational dataset. We start by identifying the most relevant algorithms in Learning Analytics and benchmark them to determine, according to internal validation and stability measurements, which algorithms perform better. We analyzed seven algorithms, and determined that K-means and PAM were the best performers among partition algorithms, and DIANA was the best performer among hierarchical algorithms
学习分析与教育数据集聚类算法的比较
学习分析正在成为分析和改进数字教育过程的关键工具,它的潜在效益随着生成数据的学生群体的规模而增长。在开放教育的背景下,潜在的庞大的学生群体和全球受众代表了学习分析领域的重大分析和突破的巨大机会。然而,这些潜在的庞大数据集需要适当的分析技术,不同的算法、工具和方法可能在这种特定环境下表现更好。在这项工作中,我们使用一个教育数据集比较了不同的聚类算法。我们首先确定学习分析中最相关的算法,并根据内部验证和稳定性测量来确定哪些算法表现更好。我们分析了7种算法,确定K-means和PAM是分区算法中性能最好的,DIANA是分层算法中性能最好的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信