¿QUÉ ES ANTIFILOSOFÍA? UNA CONSIDERACIÓN SEGÚN LACAN, BADIOU Y LA FILOSOFÍA EDIFICANTE DE RORTY

Alejandro Cavallazzi Sánchez
{"title":"¿QUÉ ES ANTIFILOSOFÍA? UNA CONSIDERACIÓN SEGÚN LACAN, BADIOU Y LA FILOSOFÍA EDIFICANTE DE RORTY","authors":"Alejandro Cavallazzi Sánchez","doi":"10.4067/S0718-50652019000100202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEste trabajo muestra las definiciones postuladas por Lacan y Badiou respecto al termino “antifilosofia” con el primer objetivo de mostrar una concepcion integral del termino y en segundo lugar compararlo con la “filosofia edificante” presentada por Rorty. La antifilosofia es un discurso que no se opone al discurso filosofico sino que tiene un objetivo distinto. Si la filosofia se ocupa desinteresadamente del conocimiento, la antifilosofia tiene siempre presente el interes del individuo. Siguiendo la lectura psicoanalitica (Lacan), filosofica (Badiou, Rorty) y estetica (Groys) pretendemos mostrar una unidad conceptual del termino antifilosofia. EnglishThis paper shows the definitions postulated by Lacan, Badiou and Groys regarding the term \"antiphilosophy\". The first objective is to present an integral conception of the term. The second objective is compare the notion of antiphilosophy with \"edifying philosophy\" as presented by Rorty. Antiphilosophy is a discourse that does not oppose philosophical discourse but has a different objective. If philosophy disinterestedly deals with knowledge, the antiphilosophy always keeps the interest of the individual in mind. Following the psychoanalytic (Lacan), philosophical (Badiou, Rorty) and aesthetic reading (Groys) of the term we intend to show a conceptual unity of the concept of antiphilosophy.","PeriodicalId":111465,"journal":{"name":"Límite (Arica)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Límite (Arica)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50652019000100202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

espanolEste trabajo muestra las definiciones postuladas por Lacan y Badiou respecto al termino “antifilosofia” con el primer objetivo de mostrar una concepcion integral del termino y en segundo lugar compararlo con la “filosofia edificante” presentada por Rorty. La antifilosofia es un discurso que no se opone al discurso filosofico sino que tiene un objetivo distinto. Si la filosofia se ocupa desinteresadamente del conocimiento, la antifilosofia tiene siempre presente el interes del individuo. Siguiendo la lectura psicoanalitica (Lacan), filosofica (Badiou, Rorty) y estetica (Groys) pretendemos mostrar una unidad conceptual del termino antifilosofia. EnglishThis paper shows the definitions postulated by Lacan, Badiou and Groys regarding the term "antiphilosophy". The first objective is to present an integral conception of the term. The second objective is compare the notion of antiphilosophy with "edifying philosophy" as presented by Rorty. Antiphilosophy is a discourse that does not oppose philosophical discourse but has a different objective. If philosophy disinterestedly deals with knowledge, the antiphilosophy always keeps the interest of the individual in mind. Following the psychoanalytic (Lacan), philosophical (Badiou, Rorty) and aesthetic reading (Groys) of the term we intend to show a conceptual unity of the concept of antiphilosophy.
什么是反哲学?拉康、巴迪欧和罗蒂的启迪哲学的考虑
这部作品展示了拉康和巴迪欧对“反哲学”一词的定义,第一个目的是展示这个词的整体概念,第二个目的是将它与罗蒂提出的“启迪哲学”进行比较。反哲学是一种与哲学话语并不对立,而是有不同目的的话语。如果哲学无私地关注知识,那么反哲学总是关注个人的利益。在阅读了精神分析(拉康)、哲学(巴迪欧、罗蒂)和美学(格罗伊斯)之后,我们打算展示反哲学术语的概念统一。这篇论文展示了拉康、巴迪欧和格罗伊对“反哲学”一词的定义。第一个目标是对这个术语提出一个完整的概念。The second目标is compare The notion of antiphilosophy with”edifying philosophy " as介绍by Rorty。Antiphilosophy is a discourse that并不oppose philosophical discourse,而是你的目标。如果philosophy disinterestedly deals with knowledge, the antiphilosophy always个人keeps the interest of the in mind。之后psychoanalytic (Lacan)、philosophical (Badiou Rorty)和aesthetic阅读(Groys)一名新任we intend to show antiphilosophy unity of the概念的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信