Onshore and Offshore Hedge Funds: Are They Twins?

G. Aragon, Bing Liang, Hyuna Park
{"title":"Onshore and Offshore Hedge Funds: Are They Twins?","authors":"G. Aragon, Bing Liang, Hyuna Park","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2014402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contrary to offshore hedge funds, US-registered (“onshore”) funds are subject to strict marketing prohibitions, accredited investor requirements, limited number of investors, and tax disadvantage. We exploit this difference to test predictions about organizational design, capital flow, and fund performance. We find that onshore funds impose stronger share restrictions such as a lockup provision than offshore funds to deter redemptions, but hold more liquid assets to reduce the cost of liquidity- motivated trading. Our results show that capital flows are less sensitive to past performance in onshore funds than in offshore funds due to regulation on advertising, and the flow sensitivity difference affects performance. Liquidity-adjusted alpha is positive and significant (0.94% per month) only for stand-alone onshore funds that have not been affected by excess capital flows from offshore investors through a master-feeder structure.","PeriodicalId":406780,"journal":{"name":"POL: Resource Financing Strategies (Topic)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POL: Resource Financing Strategies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2014402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

Abstract

Contrary to offshore hedge funds, US-registered (“onshore”) funds are subject to strict marketing prohibitions, accredited investor requirements, limited number of investors, and tax disadvantage. We exploit this difference to test predictions about organizational design, capital flow, and fund performance. We find that onshore funds impose stronger share restrictions such as a lockup provision than offshore funds to deter redemptions, but hold more liquid assets to reduce the cost of liquidity- motivated trading. Our results show that capital flows are less sensitive to past performance in onshore funds than in offshore funds due to regulation on advertising, and the flow sensitivity difference affects performance. Liquidity-adjusted alpha is positive and significant (0.94% per month) only for stand-alone onshore funds that have not been affected by excess capital flows from offshore investors through a master-feeder structure.
在岸和离岸对冲基金:它们是双胞胎吗?
与离岸对冲基金不同,在美国注册的(“在岸”)基金受到严格的营销禁令、合格投资者要求、投资者数量有限以及税收劣势的限制。我们利用这种差异来检验关于组织设计、资本流动和基金绩效的预测。我们发现,与离岸基金相比,在岸基金实施了更严格的股份限制,如锁定期规定,以阻止赎回,但持有更多的流动性资产,以降低流动性驱动的交易成本。我们的研究结果表明,由于对广告的监管,资本流动对在岸基金过去业绩的敏感性低于离岸基金,并且流动敏感性差异影响业绩。流动性调整后的alpha值为正且显著(每月0.94%),仅适用于未受境外投资者通过主-支线结构流入的过剩资本影响的独立在岸基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信