Monitoring of Low Molecular Weight Heparin Thromboprophylaxis with Alternative Methods to Anti-Factor Xa

Filippa Ölander, U. Schött
{"title":"Monitoring of Low Molecular Weight Heparin Thromboprophylaxis with Alternative Methods to Anti-Factor Xa","authors":"Filippa Ölander, U. Schött","doi":"10.29011/2637-9953.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Initiating low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis too early in patients with traumatic braininjury increases the risk of intracranial bleeding. Therefore, it is important to monitor LMWH and asses when it is safe to initiate.The aim of this research was to study alternative monitoring methods for LMWH than the standard method anti-factor Xa (antiFXa), and to investigate the peak anti-FXa level. We hoped to answer “How do rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) andSonoclot change at different LMWH concentrations added in vitro to blood from intensive care patients? How do point of careparameters change after subcutaneous LMWH administration on healthy volunteers with consecutive measurements to catch thepeak effect?”.Methods: Different concentrations of enoxaparin were added in vitro to citrated whole blood from fifteen intensive care patients.The first ten patients’ coagulation was analysed with ROTEM using the INTEM and NATEM assays, and the last five withSonoclot with a kaolin activator and ROTEM INTEM. Previously collected data was used from nine healthy volunteers that hadreceived subcutaneous enoxaparin. Citrated blood samples were collected before and after LMWH initiation and analysed withSonoclot kaolin and a chromogenic anti-FXa-assay. Friedman test, Dunn’s multiple comparison test and Spearman’s correlationtest were performed.Results: ROTEM INTEM CT, CFT, A10 and MCF were significantly affected with increasing in vitro enoxaparin from 0.4anti-FXa concentration. ROTEM NATEM CT was also prolonged at this LMWH concentration. Sonoclot’s parameters didn’tsignificantly change with increasing in vitro enoxaparin. The peak of in vivo LMWH was reached after 2 to 4 hours with avariation of peak anti-FXa between 0.3-0.5 IU/mL.Conclusions: ROTEM INTEM CT performed best and was prolonged at anti-FXa from 0.4-0.6 IU/mL. ROTEM INTEM shouldbe tested in neurointensive care to increase the safety of LMWH thromboprophylaxis and possibly to individualize the dosage. (Less)","PeriodicalId":290099,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and Medical Practice Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and Medical Practice Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2637-9953.100136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Initiating low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis too early in patients with traumatic braininjury increases the risk of intracranial bleeding. Therefore, it is important to monitor LMWH and asses when it is safe to initiate.The aim of this research was to study alternative monitoring methods for LMWH than the standard method anti-factor Xa (antiFXa), and to investigate the peak anti-FXa level. We hoped to answer “How do rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) andSonoclot change at different LMWH concentrations added in vitro to blood from intensive care patients? How do point of careparameters change after subcutaneous LMWH administration on healthy volunteers with consecutive measurements to catch thepeak effect?”.Methods: Different concentrations of enoxaparin were added in vitro to citrated whole blood from fifteen intensive care patients.The first ten patients’ coagulation was analysed with ROTEM using the INTEM and NATEM assays, and the last five withSonoclot with a kaolin activator and ROTEM INTEM. Previously collected data was used from nine healthy volunteers that hadreceived subcutaneous enoxaparin. Citrated blood samples were collected before and after LMWH initiation and analysed withSonoclot kaolin and a chromogenic anti-FXa-assay. Friedman test, Dunn’s multiple comparison test and Spearman’s correlationtest were performed.Results: ROTEM INTEM CT, CFT, A10 and MCF were significantly affected with increasing in vitro enoxaparin from 0.4anti-FXa concentration. ROTEM NATEM CT was also prolonged at this LMWH concentration. Sonoclot’s parameters didn’tsignificantly change with increasing in vitro enoxaparin. The peak of in vivo LMWH was reached after 2 to 4 hours with avariation of peak anti-FXa between 0.3-0.5 IU/mL.Conclusions: ROTEM INTEM CT performed best and was prolonged at anti-FXa from 0.4-0.6 IU/mL. ROTEM INTEM shouldbe tested in neurointensive care to increase the safety of LMWH thromboprophylaxis and possibly to individualize the dosage. (Less)
用抗Xa因子替代低分子肝素预防血栓的监测
在外伤性脑损伤患者中过早启动低分子肝素(LMWH)血栓预防会增加颅内出血的风险。因此,监测低分子肝素和评估何时可以安全启动是很重要的。本研究的目的是研究替代标准方法的低分子肝素抗Xa因子(antiFXa)监测方法,并研究抗fxa峰值水平。我们希望回答“旋转血栓弹性测定法(ROTEM)和sonoclot在重症患者血液中添加不同低分子肝素浓度时是如何变化的?”健康志愿者皮下注射低分子肝素后,护理点参数如何变化,并连续测量以达到峰值效果?方法:将不同浓度的依诺肝素添加到15例重症监护患者的柠檬酸全血中。前10例患者采用tetem和NATEM方法进行凝血分析,后5例使用sonoclot,使用高岭土活化剂和ROTEM - tem。先前收集的数据来自9名接受皮下依诺肝素治疗的健康志愿者。在低分子肝素起始前后采集柠檬酸血样本,用sonoclot高岭土和显色抗fxa测定进行分析。采用Friedman检验、Dunn多重比较检验和Spearman相关检验。结果:体外依诺肝素浓度从0.4抗fxa浓度开始升高,对ROTEM、tem、CT、CFT、A10和MCF均有显著影响。在低分子肝素浓度下,ROTEM - NATEM CT也延长。体外依诺肝素的增加对Sonoclot参数无显著影响。体内低分子肝素在2 ~ 4小时达到峰值,抗fxa峰值在0.3 ~ 0.5 IU/mL之间变化。结论:在抗fxa浓度为0.4 ~ 0.6 IU/mL范围内,ROTEM - INTEM CT效果最佳,延长时间。应在神经重症监护中检测ROTEM,以增加低分子肝素预防血栓的安全性,并可能个体化剂量。(少)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信