“D’yuh like porridge”: Social talk as a relational, interactional, and clinical component of surgical consultations

Sarah J White, M. Stubbe
{"title":"“D’yuh like porridge”: Social talk as a relational, interactional, and clinical component of surgical consultations","authors":"Sarah J White, M. Stubbe","doi":"10.7146/qhc.v1i1.125968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Small talk and social talk are often recommended to doctors as rapport building strategies for consultations. These types of talk occur across different activities in clinical consultations. Aim: To explore how small talk and social talk are used in surgical consultations. Methods: Using conversation analysis, we examined the sequential positioning and action ascription of small talk and social talk in a sample of video-recorded surgeon-patient consultations from New Zealand and Australia. Results: Small talk and social talk sequences almost always do more than build rapport in surgical interactions. Rather, they contribute in complex ways to all three institutional agendas of a consultation – clinical, interactional, and relational. Discussion: This study broadens previous topic-based analyses and binary or linear conceptualisations. We show that small talk and social talk provide a rich resource for enabling different actions within consultations as well as managing relationships (e.g. managing transitions between activities, facilitating sensitive discussions or examinations, and supporting treatment planning). Conclusion: This study has provided a basis for further research to more fully understand the complexities of small talk and social talk in clinical consultations, as well as considerations of how such evidence might best be applied within training and assessment for clinicians.","PeriodicalId":320293,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Communication","volume":"8 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/qhc.v1i1.125968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Small talk and social talk are often recommended to doctors as rapport building strategies for consultations. These types of talk occur across different activities in clinical consultations. Aim: To explore how small talk and social talk are used in surgical consultations. Methods: Using conversation analysis, we examined the sequential positioning and action ascription of small talk and social talk in a sample of video-recorded surgeon-patient consultations from New Zealand and Australia. Results: Small talk and social talk sequences almost always do more than build rapport in surgical interactions. Rather, they contribute in complex ways to all three institutional agendas of a consultation – clinical, interactional, and relational. Discussion: This study broadens previous topic-based analyses and binary or linear conceptualisations. We show that small talk and social talk provide a rich resource for enabling different actions within consultations as well as managing relationships (e.g. managing transitions between activities, facilitating sensitive discussions or examinations, and supporting treatment planning). Conclusion: This study has provided a basis for further research to more fully understand the complexities of small talk and social talk in clinical consultations, as well as considerations of how such evidence might best be applied within training and assessment for clinicians.
“D ' yu like porridge”:社交谈话作为外科会诊的关系、互动和临床组成部分
背景:闲聊和社交谈话经常被推荐给医生作为建立咨询关系的策略。这些类型的谈话发生在临床咨询的不同活动中。目的:探讨在外科会诊中如何运用闲聊和社交谈话。方法:采用会话分析的方法,对来自新西兰和澳大利亚的外科病人会诊录像样本中闲聊和社交谈话的顺序定位和动作归属进行了研究。结果:在手术互动中,闲聊和社交谈话序列几乎总是比建立融洽关系更重要。相反,他们以复杂的方式为会诊的所有三个机构议程做出贡献——临床、互动和关系。讨论:这项研究拓宽了先前基于主题的分析和二元或线性概念。我们表明,闲聊和社交谈话为在咨询中采取不同的行动以及管理关系(例如管理活动之间的过渡,促进敏感的讨论或检查,以及支持治疗计划)提供了丰富的资源。结论:本研究为进一步研究更充分地了解临床会诊中闲聊和社交谈话的复杂性,以及考虑如何将这些证据最好地应用于临床医生的培训和评估提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信