Spatial Relationship Between Atrial Fibrillation Drivers and the Presence of Repetitive Conduction Patterns Using Recurrence Analysis on In-Silico Models

Victor Gonçalves Marques, A. Gharaviri, Simone Pezzuto, P. Bonizzi, S. Zeemering, U. Schotten
{"title":"Spatial Relationship Between Atrial Fibrillation Drivers and the Presence of Repetitive Conduction Patterns Using Recurrence Analysis on In-Silico Models","authors":"Victor Gonçalves Marques, A. Gharaviri, Simone Pezzuto, P. Bonizzi, S. Zeemering, U. Schotten","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Catheter ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) is still suboptimal, possibly due to the difficulty to identify AF drivers. Recurrence analysis can be used to detect and eventually locate repetitive patterns that tend to be generated by AF drivers. In this study, we aimed to understand the spatial relationship between repetitiveness in recurrence analysis and rotor positions in an in-silico AF model. AF was simulated in a detailed three-dimensional model of the atria considering different degrees of endomysial fibrosis (0% and 70%). Rotors driving AF were tracked based on phase singularities obtained from transmembrane potentials. Activation-phase signals calculated from electrograms (4×4 electrode grid, 3 mm spacing) were used for recurrence analysis. Intervals with and without long-lasting sources inside the electrode coverage area were determined; the recurrence in both groups of intervals was quantified and compared with each other by calculating the recurrence rate (RR) per AF cycle length. RRs were lower during intervals with sources for both 0% and 70% fibrosis groups (0.56 [0.36;0.85] vs. 0.90 [0.80;0.97], $p < 0.001$ and 0.73 [0.41;0.84] vs. 0.87 [0.76;0.92], $p < 0.001$, respectively). These results indicate that recurrences are found in the area adjacent to the sources but not on the sources themselves, thus suggesting that recurrence analysis could contribute to guide ablation therapy.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Catheter ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) is still suboptimal, possibly due to the difficulty to identify AF drivers. Recurrence analysis can be used to detect and eventually locate repetitive patterns that tend to be generated by AF drivers. In this study, we aimed to understand the spatial relationship between repetitiveness in recurrence analysis and rotor positions in an in-silico AF model. AF was simulated in a detailed three-dimensional model of the atria considering different degrees of endomysial fibrosis (0% and 70%). Rotors driving AF were tracked based on phase singularities obtained from transmembrane potentials. Activation-phase signals calculated from electrograms (4×4 electrode grid, 3 mm spacing) were used for recurrence analysis. Intervals with and without long-lasting sources inside the electrode coverage area were determined; the recurrence in both groups of intervals was quantified and compared with each other by calculating the recurrence rate (RR) per AF cycle length. RRs were lower during intervals with sources for both 0% and 70% fibrosis groups (0.56 [0.36;0.85] vs. 0.90 [0.80;0.97], $p < 0.001$ and 0.73 [0.41;0.84] vs. 0.87 [0.76;0.92], $p < 0.001$, respectively). These results indicate that recurrences are found in the area adjacent to the sources but not on the sources themselves, thus suggesting that recurrence analysis could contribute to guide ablation therapy.
利用计算机模型递归分析心房颤动驱动因素与重复传导模式存在的空间关系
导管消融治疗心房颤动(AF)仍然是次优的,可能是由于难以确定房颤的驱动因素。复发分析可用于检测并最终定位AF驱动程序产生的重复模式。在这项研究中,我们的目的是了解重复的递归分析和转子位置之间的空间关系,在一个硅AF模型。考虑不同程度的肌内膜纤维化(0%和70%),在详细的心房三维模型中模拟房颤。基于从跨膜电位得到的相位奇异性,跟踪了驱动AF的转子。从电图(4×4电极网格,间隔3mm)计算的激活相位信号用于递归分析。在电极覆盖区域内确定有和没有持久源的间隔;通过计算每个AF周期长度的复发率(RR),量化两组间隔的复发率并相互比较。0%和70%纤维化组的相对危险度(rr)在不同来源间隔内均较低(分别为0.56[0.36;0.85]对0.90 [0.80;0.97],p < 0.001$和0.73[0.41;0.84]对0.87 [0.76;0.92],p < 0.001$)。这些结果表明复发发生在病灶附近而非病灶本身,提示复发分析有助于指导消融治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信