“Dykes First”

M. J. Lee, R. J. Atchison
{"title":"“Dykes First”","authors":"M. J. Lee, R. J. Atchison","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190876500.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the alternative, boundary-dwelling communities built by lesbian separatists in the late 1960s and throughout the 1970s. We examine their acidic criticisms of mixed-sex societies, their hope for multiple yet homogeneous communities of lesbians, and the strategies they used to recruit, build, and sustain collectives beyond the patriarchal United States. Like other separatists, they framed categories of identity—sex and sexuality in their case—as reasons to separate. Unlike other separatist movements, they did not seek to build a new nation. Other separatists wanted to leave their American prison and retreat into a national fortress; lesbian separatists envisioned a far more formless, scattered alternative. Other separatist discourses were stocked with singular ideals of a national homeland. Lesbian separatist discourse was, on the whole, nearly totally devoid of positive references to nations, nationality, or nationalism generally.","PeriodicalId":307209,"journal":{"name":"We Are Not One People","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"We Are Not One People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190876500.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the alternative, boundary-dwelling communities built by lesbian separatists in the late 1960s and throughout the 1970s. We examine their acidic criticisms of mixed-sex societies, their hope for multiple yet homogeneous communities of lesbians, and the strategies they used to recruit, build, and sustain collectives beyond the patriarchal United States. Like other separatists, they framed categories of identity—sex and sexuality in their case—as reasons to separate. Unlike other separatist movements, they did not seek to build a new nation. Other separatists wanted to leave their American prison and retreat into a national fortress; lesbian separatists envisioned a far more formless, scattered alternative. Other separatist discourses were stocked with singular ideals of a national homeland. Lesbian separatist discourse was, on the whole, nearly totally devoid of positive references to nations, nationality, or nationalism generally.
“堤坝第一”
本章探讨了女同性恋分离主义者在20世纪60年代末和整个70年代建立的另类、边界居住社区。我们研究了他们对混合性别社会的尖锐批评,他们对多元但同质的女同性恋社区的希望,以及他们在父权美国之外招募、建立和维持集体的策略。像其他分离主义者一样,他们将身份分类——在他们的案例中是性别和性行为——作为分离的理由。与其他分离主义运动不同,他们并不寻求建立一个新的国家。其他分裂分子想要离开他们在美国的监狱,撤退到国家堡垒;女同性恋分离主义者设想了一种更加松散、分散的替代方案。其他的分离主义言论充满了单一的民族家园理想。总的来说,女同性恋分离主义的论述几乎完全缺乏对国家、国籍或民族主义的积极提及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信