A Comparative Study of Programming Competencies in Vocational Training and Higher Education

Natalie Kiesler, Carsten Thorbrügge
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Programming Competencies in Vocational Training and Higher Education","authors":"Natalie Kiesler, Carsten Thorbrügge","doi":"10.1145/3502718.3524818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical progress and social transformation processes require lifelong learning in different spaces and formats. This leads to new developments and challenges in education with regard to competency-based learning and recognition practices, especially as educational biographies become increasingly diverse and extensive repetitions of qualifications should be avoided. Until recently, a common assessment strategy for previously developed competencies has not been established in higher education. In this study, competencies expected in German vocational and higher educational programming training were identified, compared and evaluated with regard to equivalence. The methodological approach started with an extensive review of general frameworks and curricula, before competency descriptions and analyses of reference documents of German vocational and university programming education were gathered and systematically compared. As part of the iterative design process, a comparison matrix was developed, and common features along with gaps and overlaps of competencies were identified. Even though both educational tracks pursue different goals, they share a great number of expected programming competencies. In the context of lifelong learning, the proposed process can be utilized for improving the permeability and recognition practises in both vocational training and higher education.","PeriodicalId":424418,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 1","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3502718.3524818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Technical progress and social transformation processes require lifelong learning in different spaces and formats. This leads to new developments and challenges in education with regard to competency-based learning and recognition practices, especially as educational biographies become increasingly diverse and extensive repetitions of qualifications should be avoided. Until recently, a common assessment strategy for previously developed competencies has not been established in higher education. In this study, competencies expected in German vocational and higher educational programming training were identified, compared and evaluated with regard to equivalence. The methodological approach started with an extensive review of general frameworks and curricula, before competency descriptions and analyses of reference documents of German vocational and university programming education were gathered and systematically compared. As part of the iterative design process, a comparison matrix was developed, and common features along with gaps and overlaps of competencies were identified. Even though both educational tracks pursue different goals, they share a great number of expected programming competencies. In the context of lifelong learning, the proposed process can be utilized for improving the permeability and recognition practises in both vocational training and higher education.
职业培训与高等教育中编程能力的比较研究
技术进步和社会变革过程需要在不同的空间和形式中终身学习。这在以能力为基础的学习和承认做法方面导致了教育方面的新发展和挑战,特别是在教育履历日益多样化和应避免大量重复资格的情况下。直到最近,在高等教育中还没有建立一个对以前发展的能力的共同评估策略。在这项研究中,德国职业和高等教育规划培训所期望的能力被确定,比较和评价了等效性。方法方法首先广泛审查一般框架和课程,然后收集和系统比较德国职业和大学程序设计教育的能力描述和参考文件分析。作为迭代设计过程的一部分,开发了一个比较矩阵,并确定了共同特征以及能力的差距和重叠。尽管这两种教育方式追求不同的目标,但它们都具有大量预期的编程能力。在终身学习的背景下,该过程可用于提高职业培训和高等教育的渗透性和认识实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信