Abdullah Muhammad, Kiseong Lee, Chaejin Lim, Junhee Hyeon, Zafar Salman, Dongil Han
{"title":"GAN vs Diffusion: Instance-Aware Inpainting on Small Datasets","authors":"Abdullah Muhammad, Kiseong Lee, Chaejin Lim, Junhee Hyeon, Zafar Salman, Dongil Han","doi":"10.1109/ITC-CSCC58803.2023.10212822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instance-aware inpainting is a crucial task in many fields such as fashion, entertainment, and photography. However, developing effective instance-aware inpainting methods that can generalize to various target instances is a significant challenge when large-scale datasets are not available. In this study, we compare the performance of two state-of-the-art approaches for instance-aware inpainting, namely instance-aware GAN (InstaGAN) and RePaint, a denoising diffusion probabilistic model, using small datasets. We chose these methods for comparison as GANs are widely used for image generation, while diffusion-based methods are gaining popularity for their ability to generate high-quality images. Our experiments show that RePaint outperforms InstaGAN in small-scale instance-aware inpainting tasks. RePaint utilizes a diffusion process that models the image pixel values as a random walk, which effectively removes noise and provides better results than InstaGAN's instance-aware GAN approach. The diffusion process also enables RePaint to handle a wide range of noise distributions, making it more versatile for inpainting tasks. Our results provide quantitative evidence that RePaint outperforms InstaGAN in small-scale instance-aware inpainting tasks, with a lower FID score and LPIPS score. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting the appropriate model for a given dataset and task.","PeriodicalId":220939,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers, and Communications (ITC-CSCC)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers, and Communications (ITC-CSCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITC-CSCC58803.2023.10212822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Instance-aware inpainting is a crucial task in many fields such as fashion, entertainment, and photography. However, developing effective instance-aware inpainting methods that can generalize to various target instances is a significant challenge when large-scale datasets are not available. In this study, we compare the performance of two state-of-the-art approaches for instance-aware inpainting, namely instance-aware GAN (InstaGAN) and RePaint, a denoising diffusion probabilistic model, using small datasets. We chose these methods for comparison as GANs are widely used for image generation, while diffusion-based methods are gaining popularity for their ability to generate high-quality images. Our experiments show that RePaint outperforms InstaGAN in small-scale instance-aware inpainting tasks. RePaint utilizes a diffusion process that models the image pixel values as a random walk, which effectively removes noise and provides better results than InstaGAN's instance-aware GAN approach. The diffusion process also enables RePaint to handle a wide range of noise distributions, making it more versatile for inpainting tasks. Our results provide quantitative evidence that RePaint outperforms InstaGAN in small-scale instance-aware inpainting tasks, with a lower FID score and LPIPS score. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting the appropriate model for a given dataset and task.