Development of Safety Requirements for Tracking Active Pilot Controls by Signals from an Automatic Flight Control System

A. Savelev, E. Neretin
{"title":"Development of Safety Requirements for Tracking Active Pilot Controls by Signals from an Automatic Flight Control System","authors":"A. Savelev, E. Neretin","doi":"10.1109/ICCAIRO47923.2019.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern aircraft, pilot controls are increasingly becoming sidesticks instead of steering yokes. This causes a problem, such as the lack of tactile awareness of the crew about the operation of the autopilot. One of the promising ways to develop the aircraft industry today is to introduce active pilot controls into Integrated Flight Control System (which include Fly-by-wire System and Automatic Flight Control System). Currently, not a single certified large aircraft has the integration of active controls in the Integrated Flight Control System. The purpose of the work is to analyze the need to integrate the work of active pilot controls into the work of an Automatic Flight Control System and the available results in the world. For this, simplified schemes of classical Integrated Flight Control Systems with passive pilot controls and a perspective scheme of an Integrated Flight Control System with active pilot controls are presented. This function is called \"Moving the sidestick from the autopilot.\" For this function, the following tasks are solved within the framework of this article: functional hazard assessment to determine the qualitative and quantitative requirements for the development of a function. The second part of developing safety requirements is to use the Failure Tree Analysis tool and determine budgets according to the Item Development Assurance Level and quantitative requirements for the probability of failures. The methodology for conducting this safety analyzes is based on accepted international standards - ARP 4761 and ARP 4754A. The article concludes that it is necessary to introduce active pilot controls as an opportunity to provide tactile feedback to the pilot during automatic approaches to ICAO Category IIIb, and specific quantitative and qualitative safety requirements are formulated to ensure this function.","PeriodicalId":297342,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Control, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics & Optimization (ICCAIRO)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Control, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics & Optimization (ICCAIRO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAIRO47923.2019.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In modern aircraft, pilot controls are increasingly becoming sidesticks instead of steering yokes. This causes a problem, such as the lack of tactile awareness of the crew about the operation of the autopilot. One of the promising ways to develop the aircraft industry today is to introduce active pilot controls into Integrated Flight Control System (which include Fly-by-wire System and Automatic Flight Control System). Currently, not a single certified large aircraft has the integration of active controls in the Integrated Flight Control System. The purpose of the work is to analyze the need to integrate the work of active pilot controls into the work of an Automatic Flight Control System and the available results in the world. For this, simplified schemes of classical Integrated Flight Control Systems with passive pilot controls and a perspective scheme of an Integrated Flight Control System with active pilot controls are presented. This function is called "Moving the sidestick from the autopilot." For this function, the following tasks are solved within the framework of this article: functional hazard assessment to determine the qualitative and quantitative requirements for the development of a function. The second part of developing safety requirements is to use the Failure Tree Analysis tool and determine budgets according to the Item Development Assurance Level and quantitative requirements for the probability of failures. The methodology for conducting this safety analyzes is based on accepted international standards - ARP 4761 and ARP 4754A. The article concludes that it is necessary to introduce active pilot controls as an opportunity to provide tactile feedback to the pilot during automatic approaches to ICAO Category IIIb, and specific quantitative and qualitative safety requirements are formulated to ensure this function.
利用自动飞行控制系统信号跟踪主动驾驶员控制的安全要求的发展
在现代飞机中,飞行员的控制越来越成为侧杆,而不是操纵杆。这就造成了一个问题,比如机组人员对自动驾驶仪的操作缺乏触觉意识。当今发展飞机工业的一个有前途的方法是将主动飞行员控制引入综合飞行控制系统(包括电传飞控系统和自动飞行控制系统)。目前,没有一架经过认证的大型飞机在综合飞行控制系统中集成了主动控制。本文的目的是分析将主动飞行员控制工作集成到自动飞行控制系统工作中的必要性以及国际上已有的研究结果。为此,提出了典型的带被动飞行员控制的综合飞行控制系统的简化方案和带主动飞行员控制的综合飞行控制系统的透视方案。这个功能被称为“移动自动驾驶仪的侧杆”。对于该功能,在本文的框架内解决了以下任务:功能危害评估,以确定功能开发的定性和定量要求。制定安全需求的第二部分是使用故障树分析工具,并根据项目开发保证水平和故障概率的定量要求确定预算。进行安全分析的方法是基于公认的国际标准——ARP 4761和ARP 4754A。本文的结论是,有必要引入主动飞行员控制,作为在自动接近ICAO IIIb类时向飞行员提供触觉反馈的机会,并制定了具体的定量和定性安全要求,以确保这一功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信