Governance of Ethical and Trustworthy Al Systems: Research Gaps in the ECCOLA Method

M. Agbese, Hanna-Kaisa Alanen, Jani Antikainen, Erika Halme, H. Isomäki, Marianna Jantunen, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Rebekah A. Rousi, Heidi Vainio-Pekka, Ville Vakkuri
{"title":"Governance of Ethical and Trustworthy Al Systems: Research Gaps in the ECCOLA Method","authors":"M. Agbese, Hanna-Kaisa Alanen, Jani Antikainen, Erika Halme, H. Isomäki, Marianna Jantunen, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Rebekah A. Rousi, Heidi Vainio-Pekka, Ville Vakkuri","doi":"10.1109/REW53955.2021.00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in machine learning (ML) technologies have greatly improved Artificial Intelligence (Al) systems. As a result, Al systems have become ubiquitous, with their application prevalent in virtually all sectors. However, Al systems have prompted ethical concerns, especially as their usage crosses boundaries in sensitive areas such as healthcare, transportation, and security. As a result, users are calling for better Al governance practices in ethical Al systems. Therefore, Al development methods are encouraged to foster these practices. This research analyzes the ECCOLA method for developing ethical and trustworthy Al systems to determine if it enables Al governance in development processes through ethical practices. The results demonstrate that while ECCOLA fully facilitates Al governance in corporate governance practices in all its processes, some of its practices do not fully foster data governance and information governance practices. This indicates that the method can be further improved.","PeriodicalId":393646,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REW53955.2021.00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Advances in machine learning (ML) technologies have greatly improved Artificial Intelligence (Al) systems. As a result, Al systems have become ubiquitous, with their application prevalent in virtually all sectors. However, Al systems have prompted ethical concerns, especially as their usage crosses boundaries in sensitive areas such as healthcare, transportation, and security. As a result, users are calling for better Al governance practices in ethical Al systems. Therefore, Al development methods are encouraged to foster these practices. This research analyzes the ECCOLA method for developing ethical and trustworthy Al systems to determine if it enables Al governance in development processes through ethical practices. The results demonstrate that while ECCOLA fully facilitates Al governance in corporate governance practices in all its processes, some of its practices do not fully foster data governance and information governance practices. This indicates that the method can be further improved.
伦理和可信赖人工智能系统的治理:ECCOLA方法中的研究差距
机器学习(ML)技术的进步极大地改善了人工智能(Al)系统。因此,人工智能系统已经变得无处不在,它们的应用几乎在所有领域都很普遍。然而,人工智能系统引发了伦理问题,特别是当它们在医疗、交通和安全等敏感领域的使用跨越边界时。因此,用户要求在道德人工智能系统中进行更好的人工智能治理实践。因此,鼓励人工智能开发方法培养这些实践。本研究分析了ECCOLA方法用于开发道德和可信赖的人工智能系统,以确定它是否能够通过道德实践在开发过程中实现人工智能治理。结果表明,虽然ECCOLA在所有流程的公司治理实践中充分促进了人工智能治理,但其一些实践并未充分促进数据治理和信息治理实践。这表明该方法可以进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信